Eli Lilly Profit Plunges
1 CommentBy Ed Silverman // January 31st, 2007 // 7:07 am

But ceo Sidney Taurel is very upbeat, anyway. He cites sales of new products, cost cutting and lots of cash on his balance sheet.
Here’s an update from our first post: One Wall Street analyst, Prudental Equity’s Tim Anderson, calls it a ‘good quarter to end the year,’ since most targets were met.
“Lilly successfully delivered on its sales and earnings expectations in 2006, and at the same time made significant progress on several key strategic issues,” Taurel uttered in the official statement. “Our adjusted earnings per share growth of 11 percent was among the best in the industry…”
So here are the numbers: Fourth-quarter net income dove thanks to charges and higher expenses - $132.3 million, or 12 cents, from $700.6 million, or 64 cents, a year ago. Wall Street expected 82 cents.
However, excluding one-time items, profit was $929.6 million, or 85 cents, compared with $871.6 million, or 80 cents, a year earlier. Looked at that way, one can say Lilly beat the forecasters. Revenue was up 9 percent to $4.25 billion, from $3.9 billion. For the full year, profit rose to $2.66 billion, or $2.45 a share, from $1.98 billion, or $1.81 a share a year earlier. Sales rose 7 percent to $15.7 billion from $14.7 billion.
The big product was Cymbalta: fourth-quarter sales hit $424.1 million, up 85 percent year over year, and 2006 sales were $1.3 billion, a 94 percent increase. But the Zyprexa schizphrenic treatment, which is the subject of very contentious litigation, didn’t do so well as fourth-quarter sales rose 12 percent, to $1.2 billion and 2006 sales inched up just 4 percent to $4.4 billion.
[tags]Cymbalta, Eli Lilly, Zyprexa[/tags]
Melody
Before Sid paints too rosy a picture, let us keep the attention focused on the Zyprexa issue. As more details come to light, memories will cast back to the Prozac lies, the Oraflex lies, the “insulin issue” in India wherein substandard insulin is the focus of a lawsuit. (Of course, here, responsibility, like a rubber ball, is being bounced between Lilly and its French manufacturer.) Who knowsk, if ENOUGH light is shown on this company, some truth may eventually be revealed about their rDNA human insulin, analogs and marketing shenanigans that removed all natural insulins from the U.S. market. One can only hope.