<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wyeths Wins a Prempro Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plt.starledger.webfactional.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around the web, February 15&lt;/strong&gt;

David Stirling and Tim Sandefur of Pacific Legal Foundation have an op-ed urging Jerry Brown to drop his "frivolous 'global warming' suit." [San Francisco Chronicle; PLF brief] Kreitzman Mortensen &#038; Borden post on the Dukes case. [Representing Manageme...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around the web, February 15</strong></p>
<p>David Stirling and Tim Sandefur of Pacific Legal Foundation have an op-ed urging Jerry Brown to drop his &#8220;frivolous &#8216;global warming&#8217; suit.&#8221; [San Francisco Chronicle; PLF brief] Kreitzman Mortensen &#038; Borden post on the Dukes case. [Representing Manageme&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plt.starledger.webfactional.com/2007/02/wyeths_wins_a_prempro_case/#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>Yea!!! A big win for BIG PHARMA. Now, if they can by any means obtain the coveted "FDA-approved" label for their products--regardless of how many onsumers they harm or kill--they are blameless. And the doctors who prescribe FDA-approved pills are blameless. WOW! Isn't government oversight wonderful! Always looking out for WE THE PEOPLE!

Guess until someone who's "important" (that's not us, Mr. &#038; Mrs. Average American) finds that they cannot "win the Lott-o" when a family member is killed by Big Pharma, the only hope we have is this. (In the language of Pharma) those scum-sucking, bottom-feeding, ambulance-chasing lawyers will have to test this theory of deniability  through the judicial system.

FDA will have to be revealed as incompetent,  mis-directed, undirected, CLUELESS and/or CORRUPT ( evidence should be easily obtained). And we (Mr. &#038; Mrs. Average American) will find our day in court long delayed as the Battle of the Giants (ABA vs. AMA) slogs through the courts. 

BTW, when did FDA regulations trump the responsbilities and the authorities granted our judiciary? For that matter, when did FDA regulations supercede basic human rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea!!! A big win for BIG PHARMA. Now, if they can by any means obtain the coveted &#8220;FDA-approved&#8221; label for their products&#8211;regardless of how many onsumers they harm or kill&#8211;they are blameless. And the doctors who prescribe FDA-approved pills are blameless. WOW! Isn&#8217;t government oversight wonderful! Always looking out for WE THE PEOPLE!</p>
<p>Guess until someone who&#8217;s &#8220;important&#8221; (that&#8217;s not us, Mr. &#038; Mrs. Average American) finds that they cannot &#8220;win the Lott-o&#8221; when a family member is killed by Big Pharma, the only hope we have is this. (In the language of Pharma) those scum-sucking, bottom-feeding, ambulance-chasing lawyers will have to test this theory of deniability  through the judicial system.</p>
<p>FDA will have to be revealed as incompetent,  mis-directed, undirected, CLUELESS and/or CORRUPT ( evidence should be easily obtained). And we (Mr. &#038; Mrs. Average American) will find our day in court long delayed as the Battle of the Giants (ABA vs. AMA) slogs through the courts. </p>
<p>BTW, when did FDA regulations trump the responsbilities and the authorities granted our judiciary? For that matter, when did FDA regulations supercede basic human rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.147 seconds -->

