<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Light Reading For Novartis Execs: Damage Control For Dummies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plt.starledger.webfactional.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>Hi Dr. Banerji,

Thanks for writing.

But I'm confused about your last point. Are you saying you feel that Novartis is or isn't entitled to pursue its case? 

My own view: the company has the right to go to court. It's the proper forum, of course, for disputes. By doing so, however, Novartis can't force India to changes its laws. Although if there were improper influence over this process, that would be a different matter. In any event, please clarify your comment for me.

Thanks
Ed
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr. Banerji,</p>
<p>Thanks for writing.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m confused about your last point. Are you saying you feel that Novartis is or isn&#8217;t entitled to pursue its case? </p>
<p>My own view: the company has the right to go to court. It&#8217;s the proper forum, of course, for disputes. By doing so, however, Novartis can&#8217;t force India to changes its laws. Although if there were improper influence over this process, that would be a different matter. In any event, please clarify your comment for me.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr S Banerji</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr S Banerji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plt.starledger.webfactional.com/2007/03/some_light_reading_for_novarti/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>Poor patients, who used to get Glivec free of cost, regulators who were given new safety information on Glivec by Novartis, more than a decade after molecule discovery, and oncologists who had new options from innovative formulation development, are also losers, apart from Novartis! The company is a valid corporate citizen of sovereign India, and is entitled to seek redress under the national system of justice: foreign entities, regardless of their garbs, have no locus standii to interfere in India's internal affairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor patients, who used to get Glivec free of cost, regulators who were given new safety information on Glivec by Novartis, more than a decade after molecule discovery, and oncologists who had new options from innovative formulation development, are also losers, apart from Novartis! The company is a valid corporate citizen of sovereign India, and is entitled to seek redress under the national system of justice: foreign entities, regardless of their garbs, have no locus standii to interfere in India&#8217;s internal affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.150 seconds -->

