Diabetes Meds Will Be Budget Busters

2 Comments

generic.jpg

Medco is ringing alarms again about rising spending on certain meds. In its latest annual ‘Drug Trends’ report, the big PBM singles out diabetes and cancer treatments, citing new arrivals with high price tags as ominous signs for future health care costs.

Like so many others, Medco mislabels diabetes as an epidemic (no, Virginia, you can’t catch diabetes by sharing an ice cream sundae). Nonetheless, the growing number of diabetics could cause a 70 percent increase in spending on diabetes med between now and 2009. An aging population and more overweight people are to blame for increased spending forecast to rise 16 percent to 20 percent annually, as drug usage grow by 8 percent to 10 percent each year.

The report finds that diabetes treatments were the second leading contributor in total dollars to drug spending growth in 2006, trailing only cholesterol pills. Spending on diabetes treatments increased 14.5 percent from 2005 to 2006 and the use of diabetes drugs increased 5.1 percent.

Here’s Medco’s key message: New treatments are expected to drive unit costs higher as some newer drugs are increasingly prescribed as first-line therapy. The analysis projects that by 2009, spending on diabetes meds could grow by up to 68 percent from 2006.

This is the pitch from David Snow, Medco’s ceo: “The generic dispensing rate could exceed 60 percent this year acting as a countervailing measure to control pharmacy costs especially with our aging population, where use continues to rise.”

Of course, cancer meds are a different animal, but just as troubling to Snow and his team. Drug regimens run $5,000 to $10,000 a month, making these therapies the leading driver of higher costs with more expensive niche meds displacing older ones as standard treatment. Usage grew 8.6 percent while the growth in spending hit almost 38 percent.

Medco singles out Nexavar, Revlimid and Sutent, as big reasons for the sharp increase in the average cost of treatment. Many of the newer drugs supplement existing cancer treatments, a factor that could also boost usage in coming years. Almost 25 percent of all new drugs and biologics approved last year were cancer treatments.

Nonetheless, Medco acknowledges that 2006 drug spending grew by only 2.8 percent, largely due to the increased use of generic drugs and changes brought on by Medicare Part D.

Here’s the Medco release.
[tags]Generics, Medco Health Solutions[/tags]

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. Ed–

    You know I couldn’t let this pass. Yes, numbers of diabetics are increasing (mostly Type 2 patients), but Pharma is adding to the expensiveness of this disease by several mechanisms.

    (1) They are creating labels like pre-diabetes (and then advising doctors to intervene early). This adds unknowable numbers to the “epidemic” (and the profitability).

    (2) They are witnessing “insulin resistance” (perhaps as a result of 20+ years of rDNA genetically-engineered usage) and are creating new terminology–Type 3 or Type 1-1/2–suggesting add-on treatments. Insulin users may now be told to “consume pill-form antiglycemics in addition to insulin; and Type 2’s are being switched to insulin-analogs earlier in their treatment protocols, or encouranged to use insulin IN ADDITION to other medications.

    (3) Pharma funds the studies that state “tight control” is the be-all, end-all for reduction in diabetic complications. The ONLY way to maintain tight control is to “test, and test often.” Some diabetics who seek to maintain such control may consume 15 or more test strips daily (at $1/strip). Do the math. The test strip business–without including cost of monitors–is a multi BILLION dollar/year business.

    (4) And finally, each new “improvement” in insulin-like analogs are never compared to the old natural products in terms of efficacy, safety or COST! (By the way, natural insulins have been withdrawn from the U.S. market but remain available to other industrializaed nations) Why? So consumers will believe the myth that ONLY by maintaining obscene profits can pharma develop “new and better” products.

  2. Hi Melody,

    Interesting points, all.

    And I’m sure Medco execs would agree that costs are rising for any number of reasons, stated and otherwise. And that’s why they push the generic option with reports such as this.

    Thanks for writing in,

    ed

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

,

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/