<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ethically Challenged: How Pharma Fares</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Covalence SA &#187; The Ethically Challenged: How Pharma Fares</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/#comment-3605</link>
		<dc:creator>Covalence SA &#187; The Ethically Challenged: How Pharma Fares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/#comment-3605</guid>
		<description>[...] Publication about Covalence &#124; Country: Global &#124; Company: GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck &#38; Co, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis &#124;  Source: Pharmalot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publication about Covalence | Country: Global | Company: GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck &amp; Co, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis |  Source: Pharmalot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sawitinaction</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>sawitinaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/05/the-ethically-challenged-how-pharma-fares/#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Readers must have noticed. Pfizer and Novartis have been exchanging ratings 4 and 5 in these two years. Pfizer has been all over the map in media and blogs. How come Novartis with no better ethical rating, has kept more or less low profile. No fines, no major exposure just few minor things. They must have some special skills when it comes to protecting their a....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers must have noticed. Pfizer and Novartis have been exchanging ratings 4 and 5 in these two years. Pfizer has been all over the map in media and blogs. How come Novartis with no better ethical rating, has kept more or less low profile. No fines, no major exposure just few minor things. They must have some special skills when it comes to protecting their a&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
