Texas Sues Generics For Medicaid Fraud

2 Comments

fraud.jpgThe biggest names in generics - Mylan Labs, Teva and the Sandoz unit of Novartis - are accused of a scheme that cost Texas tens of millions of dollars in overpayments to retailers for prescriptions dispensed under Medicaid. “Texas taxpayers will not tolerate the abuse of our Medicaid system and those who depend on it for their health care,” Texas attorney general Greg Abbott tells The Houston Chronicle.

He contends the drugmakers sold Medicaid-covered drugs to large retailers at deep discounts that weren’t reported to the state. Because the Texas Medicaid Program sets reimbursement costs to retailers based on prices reported by drug manufacturers, their failure to disclose the true prices resulted in the state overpaying retailers, according to the lawsuit.

Retailers aren’t named as defendants because they weren’t required to report to the Medicaid program the price they paid for the drugs, but the alleged false statements were made by the manufacturers. The “spread” between what the companies paid drug makers for the prescriptions, and the amount the retailers were reimbursed by the Medicaid program in Texas for the drugs, was meant to induce the retailers to buy from the defendants in the case.

That increased the pharmaceutical companies’ sales “and thus their profits, all to the detriment of the Texas Medicaid program, the beneficiaries thereof, and the taxpayers of Texas,” according to the lawsuit. An exact tally of the amount overpaid by the state still is being determined, but state officials believe it’s at least tens of millions of dollars.

During a budget hearing in the recent legislative session, Abbott was pressed by lawmakers to work on a backlog of 140 Medicaid fraud cases. Sen. Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, Senate Finance Committee chairman, told him in February, “The taxpayers of Texas need some more protection than they’re actually getting. I’m encouraging you to develop a more aggressive program to do this.”

Abbott requested additional funds for the task and lawmakers appropriated $12.2 million over the next two-year budget period to hire 41 additional employees to pursue civil Medicaid fraud. Kelley said Abbott “absolutely” has aggressively and successfully pursued fraud cases since taking office. Abbott’s office said Wednesday it has recovered almost $190 million through its civil and criminal Medicaid fraud sections.

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. Who had the actual benefit here ??? The retailer who pocketed the margin between reimbursement and the deep discounted purchase price or the generics company that sold much lower than is said it would. In my accounting the retailer pocketed the money not the generics co which had no gain (rather loss). Twisted thinking of Mr. Abbott (sounds like pharma (thinking) to me… pun intended ??).
    Does he actually have a case if there is no gain for the accused?

  2. Dr. No,

    There is actually benefit that accrues to the generic manufacturers that use this approach. They know that the retailers will select to carry only one generic for each chemical entity. Of course, the retailer benefits most fromt he one with the largest spread between list price and actual cost. A manufacturer that can create the widest spread wins the business.

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

, , , ,

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/