CRO Shouldn’t Invest In Drugs It Tests: Poll

1 Comment

microscope22.jpgThe commercialization of clinical trials is becoming a hot topic. Last week, we read the tale of PPD, the big clinical research organization, which took a big stake in cash-starved Accentia BioPharma and hopes to earn 14 percent on royalties if a sinus drug its testing for the company gets approved by the FDA.

Beyond the excitement of a good deal for whichever corporation is involved, at issue is the patient. The PPD deal with Accentia was criticized, by some, as a conflict of interest, while others either defended the arrangement or downplayed any problems. So we asked you to vote whether the deal is, indeed, a conflict. Here are the results….

Yes - 52 voters, or 78 percent, agreed the deal is a conflict;
No - 15 voters, or 22 percent, disagreed.
Total Voters: 67

Granted, this isn’t a scientific poll. However, the results indicate concern about the extent to which a CRO should invest in drugs in which it is conducting trials and also suggest that some additional oversight may be warranted. Thanks to those who voted.

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. engineers…

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

, , , ,

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/