<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Lilly Violate The Evista Consent Decree?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael McCaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/#comment-15825</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McCaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/#comment-15825</guid>
		<description>Ed,

Not surprisingly, Lilly votes "No." And apparently Ann Nobles did look into it. Lilly's response to the In Vivo blog post is available at http://www.invivoblog.blogspot.com/.

Thanks for the hat tip!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, Lilly votes &#8220;No.&#8221; And apparently Ann Nobles did look into it. Lilly&#8217;s response to the In Vivo blog post is available at <a href="http://www.invivoblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.invivoblog.blogspot.com/</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the hat tip!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/#comment-15807</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/07/did-lilly-violate-the-evista-consent-decree/#comment-15807</guid>
		<description>What part of "permanently enjoined" do you think Lilly is having trouble comprehending?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What part of &#8220;permanently enjoined&#8221; do you think Lilly is having trouble comprehending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.151 seconds -->

