More Med Schools Show Pharma The Door

2 Comments

exit.jpgLast month, the American Medical Student Association ranked med schools based on their freebie policies, using a PharmFree scorecard. Since then, several schools reacted with embarrassment over their rankings.

Now, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center has drafted a get-tough policy that would prohibit docs, other employees and students from accepting almost all freebies from industry. The med school dean has also endorsed the draft principles. Robert Branch, director of Pitt’s center for clinical pharmacology, tells The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that it’s unlikely companies “would make this massive investment if it wasn’t successful.” Pitt received a ‘B’ from the AMSA.

In West Virginia, Marshall University, which received an ‘F,’ is also considering a new policy. “Some faculty and administrators within the school are looking at the influence of the pharmaceutical industry and ways to limit or decrease it,” Charles McKown, dean of Marshall’s Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, tells The Charleston Gazette. “The consensus seems to be that more policies and restrictions are likely forthcoming here.”

But over at West Virginia University, which also received an ‘F,’ dean John Prescott struck a defensive tone. He says the med school won’t adopt policies based on the AMSA ranking, but would continue to discuss “how to take the best care of patients…We’ll take a good look at this. But let’s do it for the right reason…I know of no correlation between the existence of these policies and the way a medical school teaches students about ethical standards,” he tells the Gazette. And he adds that the AMSA is “a good organization, but I don’t think this was their best effort to date.”

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. I know of no correlation between the existence of these policies and the way a medical school teaches students about ethical standards,”

    I would suggest that Dean Prescott has his head planted firmly somewhere other than atop his shoulders. The recent Senate committee hearing, featuring Jerome Kassirer, Peter Lurie, Greg Rosenthal, and Sharon Treat disclosed much information that would indicate that not only does a problem exist, but that thought-leaders are aware of these problems. While it appears medical student associations are endeavoring to strike an ethical resolutions, those doctors/administrators who lead them, I fear, are unwilling to admit the existence of pharma’s undue influence. Why?

    In this same Senate hearing, Senator McCaskill immediately addressed the erosion of ethics in universities and med schools SPECIFICALLY correlated to influence-peddling. When funding and perks may evaporate when ethical considerations are addressed, I expect there will be many who, like Prescott, “see no correlation.”

  2. [...] to Pharmalot, Now, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center has drafted a get-tough policy that would [...]

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

Clear

Clear

All rights reserved, Nojasa LLC. Copyright, Nojasa LLC.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/