<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Pfizer Security Breach Hits 34,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notebook Privacy Filters, Laptop Privacy Filters</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/#comment-19473</link>
		<dc:creator>Notebook Privacy Filters, Laptop Privacy Filters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/#comment-19473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;laptop privacy filters...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#38; trackballs kids writing instruments laptop accessories laptop privacy filters left handed keyboards lighting lumbar. Arms &#38; stands printer stands privacy. Osd cf side usen......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>laptop privacy filters&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&amp; trackballs kids writing instruments laptop accessories laptop privacy filters left handed keyboards lighting lumbar. Arms &amp; stands printer stands privacy. Osd cf side usen&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah right</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/#comment-18228</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/another-pfizer-security-breach/#comment-18228</guid>
		<description>They really did a lousy job notifying employees this time around. They posted an article on the corporate intranet that had to be written by a lawyer. Many of the much needed details were omitted (what exact kind of data was stolen, why were employees notified via snail mail using an unmarked envelope that looked like junk mail, why only 2 years of identity protection when by their own admission identity thieves wait for long periods before using stolen information, were overseas employees and employee spouses and children impacted etc etc). Their announcement was roundly criticized by employees - which to their credit they posted on the intranet for all to see. However the response to the employee criticism was another posting on the intranet by their corporate counsel...95% of the content was the same and many questions still not answered. Finally after this second posting got slammed by employees, they have started answering some of the questions though not all. They are thinking like lawyers and worried about admission of liability while their employee confidence in this area has really taken a beating. No apology from CEO Jeff Kindler etc (who after all was the person corporate security reported to, before he became CEO). Hopefully they are doing something to fix this; it wouldn't hurt if a couple of state AG's investigate and help them do the right thing here...they have no problems sending sales related junk via fedex but don't want to spring for overnight mail when notifying employees of stuff like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really did a lousy job notifying employees this time around. They posted an article on the corporate intranet that had to be written by a lawyer. Many of the much needed details were omitted (what exact kind of data was stolen, why were employees notified via snail mail using an unmarked envelope that looked like junk mail, why only 2 years of identity protection when by their own admission identity thieves wait for long periods before using stolen information, were overseas employees and employee spouses and children impacted etc etc). Their announcement was roundly criticized by employees - which to their credit they posted on the intranet for all to see. However the response to the employee criticism was another posting on the intranet by their corporate counsel&#8230;95% of the content was the same and many questions still not answered. Finally after this second posting got slammed by employees, they have started answering some of the questions though not all. They are thinking like lawyers and worried about admission of liability while their employee confidence in this area has really taken a beating. No apology from CEO Jeff Kindler etc (who after all was the person corporate security reported to, before he became CEO). Hopefully they are doing something to fix this; it wouldn&#8217;t hurt if a couple of state AG&#8217;s investigate and help them do the right thing here&#8230;they have no problems sending sales related junk via fedex but don&#8217;t want to spring for overnight mail when notifying employees of stuff like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.150 seconds -->

