Zyprexa To Win FDA Approval For Teens
11 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // September 26th, 2007 // 7:39 am
That’s right. And it’s likely to occur because a senior FDA official overruled his colleagues. A three-member FDA team of medical reviewers initially urged rejecting Zyprexa for pediatric use because of inconsistent data from studies in US and Russian teens, Bloomberg News reports. But in an April 29 memo posted on the FDA’s Web site (look here), Thomas Laughren, head of the agency’s psychiatry division, wrote that the drug’s benefits in some studies outweighed the reviewers’ concerns.
Zyprexa, with $4.4 billion in global sales in 2006, is Lilly’s biggest seller and the biggest among five antipsychotics. But the teen market is important to Lilly, because Zyprexa’s market share has slipped as 86 percent of psychiatrists are writing fewer scrips due to side effects - weight gain and diabetes. Johnson & Johnson’s Risperdal last month became the only drug in the class cleared for pediatric use though docs have long prescribed the pills to children.
A growing number of states, meanwhile, are suing Lilly over improperly marketing Zyprexa. Their argument - downplaying or hiding side effect data while state Medicaid programs fork over big money for the med.
Lilly’s FDA application to market Zyprexa for pediatric use was based on a six-week study of 107 teenagers with schizophrenia, almost half of them in Russia, and a three-week test of 161 U.S. subjects with bipolar disorder. The FDA reviewers, whose report wasn’t released by the agency, urged Zyprexa’s rejection because the beneficial findings in the schizophrenia trial came mostly from Russia, Laughren wrote. His memo was posted without publicity under a 2002 law requiring the agency to release summaries when it reviews pediatric applications.
As you can see from reading the memo, Laughren acknowledged that the reviewers were concerned that Russian patients had greater responses to the drug and smaller responses to placebos than US patients. They also worried that the relative ease of patient recruitment in Russia was a sign of fraud. An FDA inspection found no such evidence, Laughren insisted. “In summary, while I agree this geographic discrepancy is a concern, I do not think it is, by itself, a sufficient justification for a nonapproval action, when the trial is positive overall on the primary analysis…”
The Russian studies “meet or exceed internationally accepted principles of clinical research,” Lilly’s Puls wrote.
Almost 44 percent of teenagers taking Zyprexa gained more than 7 percent of their body weight, compared with 7 percent of those on placebos, according to Laughren’s memo. But levels of fats, blood sugar and the hormone prolactin increased in patients taking Zyprexa, while dropping in placebo patients.
“A 7 percent increase in body weight in a young patient in such a short time may predispose people to diabetes and create a cardiac burden as the heart is forced to work harder,” Steven Klotz, a child psychiatrist in Harrisburg, Pa., tells Bloomberg. “These medications may help some patients, but I’m worried FDA approval may lead to rampant prescription writing. I don’t want drug reps telling pediatricians every adolescent that throws a tantrum is bipolar and should get antipsychotics.” Many docs are concerned weight gain and diabetes caused by the drug may be worse in children than adults.
Lilly “has no plans at this time to execute a broad promotional campaign” for Zyprexa in children, spokeswoman Carole Puls wrote Bloomberg in an e-mail. The company will “inform doctors who treat adolescents” about the new data.
In 2003, Zyprexa accounted for 32 percent of all U.S. antipsychotic prescriptions and 15 percent of pediatric orders, according to Wolters Kluwer. But by last year, its share of the US market was down to 15 percent overall and just 4.9 percent of prescriptions for children. Expanded approval is unlikely to change this trend because of concerns about side effects, analysts say.
US sales of antipsychotics grew 74 percent from 2002 to 2006 to reach $11.5 billion. That was fueled partly by a 40-fold rise in children diagnosed with bipolar disorder, or manic depression, over 10 years, according to a study published this month. The number of scrips for US kids doubled to 4.4 million from 2003 to 2006, according to Wolters Kluwer. Risperdal led the way, growing 58 percent to 1.9 million orders. Seroquel and Abilify soared to 1 million scrips each. Only Zyprexa had declining sales for US youth.
Under FDA rules, Lilly will get an extra six months of protection from competing generics for conducting pediatric studies. That’s worth about $1 billion in revenue, says Robert Hazlett, an analyst with BMO Capital Markets in New York. Bristol-Myers is seeking approval to sell Abilify to children, and its application may be reviewed by year-end, spokesman Jeffrey Macdonald says. AstraZeneca is testing Seroquel in youngsters and hasn’t decided whether to apply, says spokesman Jim Minnick.
Lisa
Dr.Tom Laughren has just issued a death sentence for our “Nation’s Children”,and these actions warrant an immediate removal from office.
Where the hell are the “WHISTLEBLOWERS”
Better yet,where the hell is Congress!!…..
Atlex
Yes, let’s turn to Congress to make clinical decisions. They’re so good at it. Notice the wonderful diagnostic job they did in the Terri Schiavo case. Last I checked, there are very few members with medical degrees.
Lisa
Atlex,
“The Terri Schiavo case”…..You have me stumped on that comment.I’ll have a second cup of coffee..maybe it will make sense then.
Lisa
Ed,
Could we get a poll on this one!!!
Melody
Atlex–
Terri Schiavo case.–I believe one of the few doctors in Congress was complicit in long-distance, video diagnosis on this case. Congress may make bad decisions, but heavily-lobbied, “entitled” doctors do, too.
Lori
Given the potential implications of this decision, known side effects and the questions surrounding the data, doesn’t it seem reasonable to require additional RCTs instead of granting approval? There is always off-label use if physicians think it has benefit, without resorting to an FDA determination of ’safe and effective’ given questionable data.
Laurie
“There is always off-label use if physicians think it has benefit, without resorting to an FDA determination of ’safe and effective’ given questionable data.”
FDA approval would stop the lawsuits(at least from the approval date and beyond) unless something is done about preemption.This is a win for pharma…and the kids suffer.
Atlex
Lisa,
If you remember the case, Congress passed a “private bill” that President Bush flew back, with great fanfare, from Texas to sign. Republicans in Congress, including the eminent Dr. Frist, passed this legislation because they “diagnosed” Schiavo as not being in a persistant vegetative state. Of course, the autopsy after Schiavo’s death refuted Frist and his colleagues.
Congress is just not the place for medical decisions.
Atlex
Lisa
Congress is “RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSIGHT”
They have qualified and responsible physicians at their finger tips to advise them on the data.
The Schiavo case was a misstep I’ll give you that one…This case was driven by religion, not science..
Anna
The NIH CATIE study stated that Zypexa had the worst side effects of all the atypical antipsychotics. The American Diabetes Association claimed it as most likely to cause diabetes of any of the atypicals. And 29,000 lawsuits against Lilly for diabetes, hyperglycemia, and death along with other complications were not replicated by any other atypical.
What does it take to get this drug thrown off the market?
Oh, excuse me, I forgot. The Bush family are very close friends with various Lilly family members and executives. It sure won’t happen as long as Junior remains in office.
Rolando
Bogus diagnosis for bogus “deceases” . Childhood is a decease , a profitable decease. But so is feeling human emotions. What will happen to mankind if they succeed
in bringing apathy to mankind? Aside from the side effects, which are scary enough, the loss of livingness and joy are probably scarier.