<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwards: Ban DTC For New Drugs For 2 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Edwards on Drugsâ€”Again</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23902</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Edwards on Drugsâ€”Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23902</guid>
		<description>[...] MD likes this idea, and the folks at Pharmalot are apprently OK with it as well, but I have to say that Iâ€™m pretty queasy about this sort of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MD likes this idea, and the folks at Pharmalot are apprently OK with it as well, but I have to say that Iâ€™m pretty queasy about this sort of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23796</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23796</guid>
		<description>Good grief.  The American Constitution functioned very well without DTC ads of the sort we have now.  Even Bill Frist once supported a 2-year moratorium.  Is he also an enemy of liberty and all things Constitutional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief.  The American Constitution functioned very well without DTC ads of the sort we have now.  Even Bill Frist once supported a 2-year moratorium.  Is he also an enemy of liberty and all things Constitutional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23744</guid>
		<description>There is one updside to DTC advertising - it increases awareness of treatment options.  I don't have restless leg syndrome, but if I did, would I know someone made a drug to treat it without DTC advertising?  Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one updside to DTC advertising - it increases awareness of treatment options.  I don&#8217;t have restless leg syndrome, but if I did, would I know someone made a drug to treat it without DTC advertising?  Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlex</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23736</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23736</guid>
		<description>What makes it inappropriate, the fact that you don't like it? Ever hear of the US Constitution--say the First Amendment.  Pharma companies have the same rights as you do with regards to free speech and advertising typically falls under that protection.  Can the government put restrictions on advertising--perhaps a few, but with limits?

Finally, your last statement makes no sense when you look at the data.  The industry spent between $3 and $4 billion dollars last year on DTC.  This amount to 1% to 2% of sales.  Even if all of these expenses were directed toward lowering prices, the drop would be miniscule.  Many would argue that a ban on advertising would yield increased prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes it inappropriate, the fact that you don&#8217;t like it? Ever hear of the US Constitution&#8211;say the First Amendment.  Pharma companies have the same rights as you do with regards to free speech and advertising typically falls under that protection.  Can the government put restrictions on advertising&#8211;perhaps a few, but with limits?</p>
<p>Finally, your last statement makes no sense when you look at the data.  The industry spent between $3 and $4 billion dollars last year on DTC.  This amount to 1% to 2% of sales.  Even if all of these expenses were directed toward lowering prices, the drop would be miniscule.  Many would argue that a ban on advertising would yield increased prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23732</link>
		<dc:creator>CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/10/edwards-ban-dtc-for-new-drugs-for-2-years/#comment-23732</guid>
		<description>Agreed!  The DTC effort should be prohibited as it is in Europe.  Instead of billions spent on inappropriate marketing efforts, Big Pharma should lower their prices for people that can't afford it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!  The DTC effort should be prohibited as it is in Europe.  Instead of billions spent on inappropriate marketing efforts, Big Pharma should lower their prices for people that can&#8217;t afford it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
