<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Allergan Bats Its Lashes At Glaucoma Drug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Alan Bauman - Bauman Medical Group</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-29159</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Alan Bauman - Bauman Medical Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-29159</guid>
		<description>I've prescribed Lumigan, as well as the other 'cosmetic' products, and witnessed DRAMATIC eyelash growth in our patients.  In our patients, we've seen few, if any, side-effects other than minor, transient irritation.   Bimatoprost, as well as other prostaglanding analogs, are considered by experts to be an exceptionally safe group of medication and even the FDA acknowledged that there have been no reports of decreased vision from these products.   There are essentially no systemic side effects from prostaglandin analogs reported in the medical literature.  If you consider the alternatives for those women who want enhanced lashes (mascara, false eyelash extensions, topical meds, and eyelash transplants), the topical treatment is quite a good option.  Personally, I like the idea of keeping these treatments out of the salons and having them prescribed &#38; dispensed under the supervision of physicians.   We'll have to wait and see how Allergan does defending their turf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve prescribed Lumigan, as well as the other &#8216;cosmetic&#8217; products, and witnessed DRAMATIC eyelash growth in our patients.  In our patients, we&#8217;ve seen few, if any, side-effects other than minor, transient irritation.   Bimatoprost, as well as other prostaglanding analogs, are considered by experts to be an exceptionally safe group of medication and even the FDA acknowledged that there have been no reports of decreased vision from these products.   There are essentially no systemic side effects from prostaglandin analogs reported in the medical literature.  If you consider the alternatives for those women who want enhanced lashes (mascara, false eyelash extensions, topical meds, and eyelash transplants), the topical treatment is quite a good option.  Personally, I like the idea of keeping these treatments out of the salons and having them prescribed &amp; dispensed under the supervision of physicians.   We&#8217;ll have to wait and see how Allergan does defending their turf&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27368</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27368</guid>
		<description>The below just in from FDA on this product:

FDA informed healthcare professionals and consumers of the seizure of 12,682 applicator tubes of Age Intervention Eyelash, sold and distributed by Jan Marini Skin Research, Inc. of San Jose, California. The product was seized because it may lead to decreased vision in some users. The eyelash product is an unapproved and misbranded drug because it is promoted to increase eyelash growth. Before a new drug product may legally be marketed, it must be shown to be safe and effective, and approved by FDA. FDA considers the product to be an adulterated cosmetic because it contains bimatoprost, an active ingredient in an FDA-approved drug to treat elevated intraocular pressure (elevated pressure inside the eye). Use of the prescription drug in addition to the eyelash product containing the drug, may increase the risk of optic nerve damage because the extra dose of bimatoprost may decrease the prescription drug's effectiveness. Damage to the optic nerve may lead to deceased vision and possibly blindness. Other possible adverse events may include macular edema (swelling of the retina) and uveitis (inflammation in the eye) which may lead to decreased vision. 

Dermatologists, estheticians, and consumers who may still have Age Intervention Eyelash should discontinue use and discard any remaining product. Consumers should also consult their healthcare professional if they have experienced any adverse events that they suspect are related to use of the product. 

Read the complete 2007 MedWatch safety summary including a link to the FDA News Release regarding this issue at:  

http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/safety07.htm#Eyelash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The below just in from FDA on this product:</p>
<p>FDA informed healthcare professionals and consumers of the seizure of 12,682 applicator tubes of Age Intervention Eyelash, sold and distributed by Jan Marini Skin Research, Inc. of San Jose, California. The product was seized because it may lead to decreased vision in some users. The eyelash product is an unapproved and misbranded drug because it is promoted to increase eyelash growth. Before a new drug product may legally be marketed, it must be shown to be safe and effective, and approved by FDA. FDA considers the product to be an adulterated cosmetic because it contains bimatoprost, an active ingredient in an FDA-approved drug to treat elevated intraocular pressure (elevated pressure inside the eye). Use of the prescription drug in addition to the eyelash product containing the drug, may increase the risk of optic nerve damage because the extra dose of bimatoprost may decrease the prescription drug&#8217;s effectiveness. Damage to the optic nerve may lead to deceased vision and possibly blindness. Other possible adverse events may include macular edema (swelling of the retina) and uveitis (inflammation in the eye) which may lead to decreased vision. </p>
<p>Dermatologists, estheticians, and consumers who may still have Age Intervention Eyelash should discontinue use and discard any remaining product. Consumers should also consult their healthcare professional if they have experienced any adverse events that they suspect are related to use of the product. </p>
<p>Read the complete 2007 MedWatch safety summary including a link to the FDA News Release regarding this issue at:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/safety07.htm#Eyelash" rel="nofollow">http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/safety07.htm#Eyelash</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27218</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Here's the precribing info....

http://www.lumigan.com/46link%20-%20PI.pdf

ed at Pharmalot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the precribing info&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lumigan.com/46link%20-%20PI.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.lumigan.com/46link%20-%20PI.pdf</a></p>
<p>ed at Pharmalot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27212</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/allergan-bats-its-lashes-at-glaucoma-drug/#comment-27212</guid>
		<description>Scares the heck out of me.  I used Lumigan for a period for ocular hypertension, and the side effects were incapacitating.  After three retrials, they only became worse.  Is there labelling on this thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scares the heck out of me.  I used Lumigan for a period for ocular hypertension, and the side effects were incapacitating.  After three retrials, they only became worse.  Is there labelling on this thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.158 seconds -->

