<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Drug Approvals Declining Rapidly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friday Blog Roundup &#171; The Pump Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26428</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Blog Roundup &#171; The Pump Handle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26428</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Silverman at Pharmalot considers the drop in new drug approvals by the FDA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Silverman at Pharmalot considers the drop in new drug approvals by the FDA. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26405</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26405</guid>
		<description>A risk-free society is one not worth living in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A risk-free society is one not worth living in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26338</guid>
		<description>Hank, 
Generally an NDA takes 6 to 9 monthes (or longer) for approval.  The approvals in 1996 were probably submitted between mid 1995 and mid 1996.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank,<br />
Generally an NDA takes 6 to 9 monthes (or longer) for approval.  The approvals in 1996 were probably submitted between mid 1995 and mid 1996.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26320</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26320</guid>
		<description>I'm asking myself how there was a 109% approval rate in 1996.  Were some of these NDAs left over from earlier years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m asking myself how there was a 109% approval rate in 1996.  Were some of these NDAs left over from earlier years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/decline-in-new-drug-approvals-hits-new-low/#comment-26277</guid>
		<description>More progress on our path to the risk-free society!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More progress on our path to the risk-free society!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.150 seconds -->

