“Reflexive Defamitory Statements about people they know nothing about”

What about Bob and others,do you condone their behaviour?… Or is it, alls well in the he man, Woman haters club!! As a former volunteer of the Women’s Crisis Center,..You will receive no apology from me!!!!

For years UMDNJ has been involved in scandolous behaviour, at NJ taxpayers expense.UMDNJ conducts numerous clinical trials that are funded by the Pharmaceutical Industry.And Lilly funds physician education(Partners for Psychiatry), All you have to do is google.

As a Law Abiding, Tax Paying Resident, here in the State of NJ,I Believe, gives me the right to ask questions. And If YOU dont like it, so be it.!!

This is the first step in a process that the law has identified (FDA Reauthorization). The process we are now seeing start to play out will result in the FDA using over 100 million patient records (not claims, records) to assess drug adverse events, interactions, and so forth - and use this panel to “communicate” the results, impact, implications and so forth to the general public (please read the bill if you haven’t seen this). The FDA has been given two years to identify the appropriate data handling and analytical approaches to use, but this is coming folks. I know EMRs are not that widely used yet - but the bill gives the FDA a mandate to go and get them.

Does anyone agree with me that this could result in a massive loss of control and influence as far as pharma is concerned, and the impact on drug approvals, reimbursement and prescribing could result in huge changes to the way in which we do business? It won’t all be negative, but given the industry reputation just now I don’t feel confident that it won’t all be positive either.

Kinda like what you did to Lisa??? If you go back to the (Scarlet Golf Shirt) post on Nov. 2nd and re-read you will see that Lisa only stated that Pharmalot has the ( ABILITY )to protect women from sexual harassment on their site and asked them to do so…How you see that as a thinly veiled threat toward’s Ed, Pharmalot, or the Star Ledger has got me stumped. So please be clear on your fact’s before commenting, the same as you are asking of the rest of us.

Get it now?

I have no direct personal interest other than an attempt get people to be honest and not make reflexive defamatory statements about people they know nothing about.

Even if she turns out to be a shill, it doesn’t justify the baseless accusation in retrospect.

I’m flabbergasted you don’t seem to understand why accusing someone of something that you have no proof of is wrong. It’s like you’re willfully ignoring this very simple fact.

Of course we have the right to know etc., that’s not the point. You’re just making wild allegations. Kind of like when people call you Scientologist or nutball.

How does this not make any sense to you?

So you acknowledge that I’ve been civil, but still feel it’s okay to tell me to go to hell? Are you pathologically unable to say something like, “I am sorry, I was wrong”?

Had I used a question mark,instead of an exclamation point, would we be having this conversation? And, if there are Conflicts of interest, do we not have the right to know?
And who should be held to a higher standard, the Consumer, or the Industry and its researchers?

Yes,you have been civil.

Yes, there is free speech, but there is also responsibility and consequences for saying or writing things that are untrue (i.e., slander and libel). In fact, it wasn’t more than a week ago where you issued a thinly veiled threat to Ed that the Star Ledger, which owns Pharmalot, would be responsible for sexual harassment that occurred on this board. Where does libel stack up I wonder?

And did you really just tell me to go to hell? Have I ever called you names? Have I ever been anything but civil to you despite our differences?