<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Med Center Bans Industry Gifts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-28077</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-28077</guid>
		<description>Dear Tex,

You're right, I'm not from Texas. I'm from Brooklyn. That said, I did something headline writers do when they don't have much space - I went for a few words that would be most easily recognizable to the largest number of people. Outside Texas, not too many people would recognize UTHSC-San Antonio. Moreover, UTHSC is a marbly mouthful. My apologies, though, if my approach turned you off. But I had to make a choice and, for better or worse, that's I went with. Next time, I'll try to find something more eloquent and accurate.

Thanks for writing in.

ed at Pharmalot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tex,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I&#8217;m not from Texas. I&#8217;m from Brooklyn. That said, I did something headline writers do when they don&#8217;t have much space - I went for a few words that would be most easily recognizable to the largest number of people. Outside Texas, not too many people would recognize UTHSC-San Antonio. Moreover, UTHSC is a marbly mouthful. My apologies, though, if my approach turned you off. But I had to make a choice and, for better or worse, that&#8217;s I went with. Next time, I&#8217;ll try to find something more eloquent and accurate.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing in.</p>
<p>ed at Pharmalot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fromTexas</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-28074</link>
		<dc:creator>fromTexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-28074</guid>
		<description>The writer clearly is not from Texas because he says the "Texas Med Center" banned gifts from the pharmaceutical industry.  This is about UTHSC-San Antonio.  The TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER specifically means the medical complex in the Texas Medical Center in Houston, which has UT-Houston and Baylor College of Medicine.  Pharmaceutical reps are still crawling there (as I know my uncle flew there recently, working for Merck).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writer clearly is not from Texas because he says the &#8220;Texas Med Center&#8221; banned gifts from the pharmaceutical industry.  This is about UTHSC-San Antonio.  The TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER specifically means the medical complex in the Texas Medical Center in Houston, which has UT-Houston and Baylor College of Medicine.  Pharmaceutical reps are still crawling there (as I know my uncle flew there recently, working for Merck).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Remulac</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-25640</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Remulac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/texas-med-center-bans-industry-gifts/#comment-25640</guid>
		<description>As a former academic and current pharma scientist, I am all for such high-minded ideals such as this.  However, I find it ironic that these holier-than-thou medical institutions publicly decry the pharma industry while all the while having their hand out privately.  UPMC and UTHSC will have my respect when they no longer demand that their institutions be paid overhead (often as high as 30%-40%)when legitimate research grants from pharma are given to investigators at their centers, nor should they continue to accept salary and benefit support for study personnel based on % effort.  Furthermore, they should prohibit faculty and staff from owning drug company stocks, even in the form of mutual fund holdings....that is, if they are truly interested in removing conflicts of interest.  fat chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former academic and current pharma scientist, I am all for such high-minded ideals such as this.  However, I find it ironic that these holier-than-thou medical institutions publicly decry the pharma industry while all the while having their hand out privately.  UPMC and UTHSC will have my respect when they no longer demand that their institutions be paid overhead (often as high as 30%-40%)when legitimate research grants from pharma are given to investigators at their centers, nor should they continue to accept salary and benefit support for study personnel based on % effort.  Furthermore, they should prohibit faculty and staff from owning drug company stocks, even in the form of mutual fund holdings&#8230;.that is, if they are truly interested in removing conflicts of interest.  fat chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
