<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Tries To Close &#8216;Loophole&#8217; For Drugmakers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tuchtklacht  Boskamp &#38; Willems Advocaten</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/#comment-106019</link>
		<dc:creator>tuchtklacht  Boskamp &#38; Willems Advocaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/#comment-106019</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;tuchtklacht  Boskamp &#38; Willems Advocaten...&lt;/strong&gt;

It can often times get burdensome to sort the reliable lawyer reading from the dreadful....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tuchtklacht  Boskamp &#38; Willems Advocaten&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It can often times get burdensome to sort the reliable lawyer reading from the dreadful&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/#comment-29934</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/12/judge-tries-to-close-loophole-for-drugmakers/#comment-29934</guid>
		<description>Very informative post, Ed.  Thanks.

Two lesser points.  It is, indeed, "inside baseball" if one intends to follow all the precedents and arguments for their relevance.  

But there is also a lot of mystification in that - both to suggest to non-layweres that we "should not worry our little heads about it," and to search for defense arguments where (to the average non-lawyer), there ain't nothing under the rock but shadow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative post, Ed.  Thanks.</p>
<p>Two lesser points.  It is, indeed, &#8220;inside baseball&#8221; if one intends to follow all the precedents and arguments for their relevance.  </p>
<p>But there is also a lot of mystification in that - both to suggest to non-layweres that we &#8220;should not worry our little heads about it,&#8221; and to search for defense arguments where (to the average non-lawyer), there ain&#8217;t nothing under the rock but shadow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.200 seconds -->

