Lilly’s CEO-In-Waiting: ‘We’re Not Hiding Secrets’

2 Comments

john-lechleiter.jpgJohn Lechleiter will soon succeed Sid Taurel at the helm of the big drugmaker. A scientist by training, Lechleiter is wasting little time setting a tone. Although he doesn’t take credit for firing back at The New York Times last week, he clearly revels in the openness he believes was achieved by refuting a story about failing to disclose Prozac clinical trials, which was later corrected.

Today, Lechleiter tells The WSJ Health blog that Lilly and pharma get a bad rap, and so he’s fighting back. “We can talk and talk and talk but we’ve got to walk the talk,” Lechleiter says. “We’ve been forthright. When we’re willing to come back and set the record straight, we’re showing through actions that this is not the stereotype people have of this industry….we’re not hiding secrets in the closet.”

If so, John, then why not release all Zyprexa data that was the subject of so much controversy last year in federal court, where some documents about hidden or undisclosed side effects were leaked but remain under seal? And why wasn’t there a press release issued last week when another 900 Zyprexa personal-injury claims were settled for an undisclosed amount? The deal, by the way, meant Lilly has settled more than 25,000 claims, leaving about 1,100 unsettled.

He also refers to the trumpeted policy of registering all clinical trials for marketed products since December 2004. But Phase IV trials completed before July 1, 2004 aren’t posted. Why that date? That’s when Lilly implemented its policy, after which the drugmaker “discloses publicly all medical research results that are significant to patients, health care providers or payers - whether favorable or unfavorable to a Lilly product.”

But Phase IV trials are conducted to look at side effects and safety; long-term risks and benefits, and how well the drug works when used in a real-world population beyond a clinical setting (and let’s not forget marketing claims). In other words, new info and fresh insights can be learned. For reasons that aren’t clear, Lilly has chosen to use a specific cut-off date and, as a result, patients, health care providers and payers are denied an opportunity to know as much as possible about its meds.

John, if Lilly isn’t hiding anything, perhaps when you officially become ceo, you’ll start releasing more info that your customers want to see.

Hat tip to the WSJ Health blog

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. If Lilly isn’t hiding anything, I would like to see the published results from the post-marketing trial MANDATED by the FDA at the time the agency approved rDNA “human” insulin. My FOIA requests, and inquiries to the company have been met with absolute silence.

  2. As the director of Novus Medical Detox, we see daily the problems created by these anti-depressant and anit-psychotic drugs. I just found your blog and will read if often.

    Seems to me that the biggest problem is that many of the doctors that “study” the drugs and speak at CE classes for MD’s are paid by the drug companies. We need unbiased scientific reports.

    Steve Hayes
    http://www.novusdetox.com

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

, , ,

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/