<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Was Granted The Most Patents In 2007?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/#comment-101250</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/#comment-101250</guid>
		<description>Now I wonder or know,  who has the FDA in there back pocket. And who at the FDA is benefiting from all these patents?   Is how their bad drug TEQUIN made on market and disrupted so many users lives by it causing diabetes as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I wonder or know,  who has the FDA in there back pocket. And who at the FDA is benefiting from all these patents?   Is how their bad drug TEQUIN made on market and disrupted so many users lives by it causing diabetes as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/#comment-98036</link>
		<dc:creator>David Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/01/who-was-granted-the-most-patents-in-2007/#comment-98036</guid>
		<description>It's hard to tell from the graph, but GlaxoSmithKline appears to have about the same number of patent awards as BMS.  The patents for SmithKline Beecham must be added to the awards for Glaxo Group LTD if you are fairly comparing the biopharmas of 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to tell from the graph, but GlaxoSmithKline appears to have about the same number of patent awards as BMS.  The patents for SmithKline Beecham must be added to the awards for Glaxo Group LTD if you are fairly comparing the biopharmas of 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.146 seconds -->

