<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Heparin Plant Was Never Licensed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: austin</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-327411</link>
		<dc:creator>austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-327411</guid>
		<description>It took a bit of foresight to introduce chemically similar compounds into Heparin that would fool Baxter's tests. 

I do not see how this is any different than putting cyanide into aspirin bottles.

One wonders what other novel bioagents could be introduced by the Chinese into the US Healthcare system via such novel means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took a bit of foresight to introduce chemically similar compounds into Heparin that would fool Baxter&#8217;s tests. </p>
<p>I do not see how this is any different than putting cyanide into aspirin bottles.</p>
<p>One wonders what other novel bioagents could be introduced by the Chinese into the US Healthcare system via such novel means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Heparin Mystery &#171; pills and potions</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-325509</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heparin Mystery &#171; pills and potions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-325509</guid>
		<description>[...] Details about the Chinese manufacturer of the active ingredient that was apparently modified deliberately [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Details about the Chinese manufacturer of the active ingredient that was apparently modified deliberately [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;Heparin Mystery&#8221; &#171; It&#8217;s JG! Just Me</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-325500</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;Heparin Mystery&#8221; &#171; It&#8217;s JG! Just Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-325500</guid>
		<description>[...] Details about the Chinese manufacturer of the active ingredient that was apparently modified deliberately [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Details about the Chinese manufacturer of the active ingredient that was apparently modified deliberately [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-162622</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/02/chinese-heparin-plant-was-never-licensed/#comment-162622</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work FDA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work FDA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.166 seconds -->

