Forgetting The Rules? Wyeth, Elan & Alzheimer’s
3 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // February 29th, 2008 // 2:05 pm
What would you think if the two drugmakers decided to use a new and unproven endpoint to measure the memory and mental status in patients in a Phase III trial of their closely watched, experimental Alzheimer’s treatment? Might Wyeth and Elan be searching for an easier route to win FDA approval for their medication, known as bapineuzumab?
That’s the question raised in an interesting column by Adam Feuerstein at TheStreet.com. He writes that, by creating their own test to measure bapineuzumab’s efficacy, Elan and Wyeth are seeking an alternative to the so-called ADAS-cog, despite that test’s imprimatur as the gold standard measure of cognitive function. The ADAS-cog has been used as the basis for approval for all Alzheimer’s disease drugs to date.
Elan has devised a new clinical endpoint, which it calls the Neuropsychological Test Battery, or NTB, he continues. The Irish drugmaker has used the NTB in previous studies of its Alzheimer’s drugs to demonstrate improvements in the mental status of patients when similar measurements using ADAS-cog showed no benefit, according to Feuerstein.
This is the first time, however, that Elan and partner Wyeth will attempt to convince regulatory authorities in the U.S. and Europe that the NTB should be considered as the basis to approve a new Alzheimer’s drug, he writes. And the drugmakers are pushing the test even though the NTB has not yet been independently validated by anyone outside the two companies, nor has it ever been used as a primary endpoint in any pivotal trial for Alzheimer’s.
The ADAS-cog test, by comparison, is the most widely recognized and utilized measure of cognition in Alzheimer’s drug trials. All four Alzheimer’s drugs currently on the market used the ADAS-cog test as the endpoint of their phase III trials. The only other two drugmakers with experimental Alzheimer’s drugs in phase III studies right now - Myriad Genetics and Medivation - are using the measure as their primary endpoint in their respective studies.
Peter Davies, an Alzheimer’s researcher at New York’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine, questions why any company would seek to develop an alternative cognitive test when the standard and well-understood ADAS-cog test has proven time and time again to be entirely adequate. “What we need are better Alzheimer’s disease drugs, not better tests,” Davies tells TheStreet. “If a drug cannot show improvement in cognitive function using the ADAS-cog test, then the drug is not worth bothering with.”
Feuerstein goes on to note there is intense interest in bapineuzumab, both from the medical community and Wall Street, because it is the first antibody drug in Alzheimer’s to reach Phase III. Bapineuzumab is closely tracked because it has been designed to actually improve a patient’s memory and mental status instead of merely temporarily treating the symptoms of Alzheimer’s. Any drug that can modify or reverse the course of Alzheimer’s will generate billions of dollars in sales.
Elan and Wyeth have announced plans to conduct four bapineuzumab Phase III trials, which will track approximately 4,000 patients with mild to moderate forms of Alzheimer’s, he continues, adding that two of those studies began enrolling North American patients in December; the remaining two studies, to be conducted in Europe and the rest of the world, are expected to begin soon.
To date, neither Elan nor Wyeth has announced publicly the primary efficacy endpoints of these studies. The companies have stated only that the efficacy of bapineuzumab will be measured using one cognitive and one functional endpoint. Two Alzheimer’s researchers familiar with the study protocols for the bapineuzumab phase III studies have confirmed that NTB was chosen as the primary endpoint, with the ADAS-cog test listed as a secondary endpoint, Feuerstein writes.
This is a lengthy but very interesting column, so if you’d like to read more, just look here.
adam feuerstein
ed — thanks for the plug. great blog, by the way.
adam
ol cranky
I know a lot of people at Wyeth and they’ve had nothing but complaints about working with Elan on this project. Knowing how poorly done Elan studies are, I find this mildly amusing.
CBER was notorious for not caring about the utility or validity of a tool used for primary efficacy. CDER is picky. It is possible that the companies made a good case for use of NTB in the SPA process and that the tool will be validated during phase III with those validation studies and all other supporting documentation being required to be submitted as part of the agreement with the FDA. It’s also possible that the companies just pissed the agency off during the SPA process and the agency agreed to let them run the risk of hanging themselves so late in the game.
snugpharma
Excuse me, was it appropriate for On the Street’s Adam Feurestein to use Peter Davies commentary without informing the public of Peter Davies pro Tau hypothesis and is recognised in Alzheimer’s research as a staunch skeptic of the beta amyloid hypothesis. Great plug Adam, I don’t think so. It’s leaking already. snug
The New York Times, 2007, Article on Alzheimer’s disease; Peter Davies commentary
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/health/26alzheimers.html?pagewanted=print
Some scientists doubt the amyloid theory, but even a staunch skeptic said the studies were important.
Among the skeptics is Dr. Peter Davies, a professor at Albert Einstein Medical College, who said: “You’ve got to try. Somebody’s going to get this right.”