Reporter Says Lilly Leak Was No Leak

3 Comments

oops.jpgYesterday, we wrote how an unnamed Pepper Hamilton lawyer accidentally sent an e-mail containing confidential info to a reporter at The New York Times. The document supposedly had details of a settlement the drugmaker is negotiating with federal and state prosecutors over improper marketing of Zyprexa. The alleged leak, as originally reported by Portfolio, occurred because the reporter, Alex Berenson, has the same last name as another lawyer who was to have received the e-mail, Brad Berenson of Sidley Austin.

However, it appears that Portfolio got it wrong. The Drug and Device Law blog, which first noticed the item yesterday, wrote us to say they ran a correction after speaking with Berenson - the reporter, not the lawyer. So we rang Berenson and he says: “Yes, I did receive a misdirected e-mail from Pepper Hamilton, but it didn’t contain a detailed description of the settlement talks. And yes, I had already known independently about the talks, and I obtained the details I published from sources other than the law firm. The e-mail I received was, essentially, two lines long about a conference call.” However, he acknowledges that the e-mail did confirm, without offering details, that Lilly was in talks with prosecutors.

Robert Heideck, an executive partner at Pepper Hamilton, declined to comment. We left a message with the editor at Portfolio, but have not yet received a reply. For now, the original item still remains on the Portfolio site. As a result, remains unclear whether Portfolio will run a correction or stand by its version of events. UPDATE: A spokeswoman for Portfolio calls us to say the site stands by the item: “The document Mr. Berenson received clearly confirmed settlement talks. In addition, our piece never said it was the sole source of his information.”

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. Didn’t The Portfolio ask Alex Berenson for a comment, and he replied ‘I can’t. I just can’t” or something like that? Why didn’t he clear the record at that time?

  2. Oh good - more to come! It was worryingly disappointing on the comic pharma side of things, until you added the UPDATE :)

  3. Kudos on this post. I’m impressed with the level of detail Mr. Berenson gave you regarding the sourcing of his reporting. Like Chris, I, too, wonder wonder why Mr. Berenson didn’t set the record straight when he received a call from Portfolio.

    For the record, I issued a public apology after the Times officially denied the Portfolio story.

    http://www.starkmanassociates.com/2008/02/07/pepper-hamilton-email-error/

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Tags

, , , ,

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/