<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut Sues Lilly Over Zyprexa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Atlex</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205657</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205657</guid>
		<description>Hadassah Lieberman worked at Pfizer but left before Joe was elected to the Senate in 1988.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadassah Lieberman worked at Pfizer but left before Joe was elected to the Senate in 1988.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205636</link>
		<dc:creator>Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205636</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall that Lieberman's wife was/is a consultant to Pfizer and one of his daughters works/worked for Pfizer in some capacity.  This was true in 2000 and I have no idea if it's still accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall that Lieberman&#8217;s wife was/is a consultant to Pfizer and one of his daughters works/worked for Pfizer in some capacity.  This was true in 2000 and I have no idea if it&#8217;s still accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205549</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205549</guid>
		<description>Hi Melody,

In case others are curious, there is a link to the complete lawsuit in this post. 

Regards
ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Melody,</p>
<p>In case others are curious, there is a link to the complete lawsuit in this post. </p>
<p>Regards<br />
ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205539</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-205539</guid>
		<description>I received this e-mail from a IDDM friend:
"Eli Lilly adopted a sick marketing mindset: profits over patients, sales over safety," Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. "Through a complex series of illegal rackets and lies, Eli Lilly built a multibillion-dollar drug enterprise at the expense of taxpayers, consumers and patient lives," Blumenthal said in a scathing statement. He accused the drugmaker of corrupting doctors, pharmacies and public officials nationwide, "who easily abandoned integrity and decency for self-enrichment." Ironically, this is from a lawsuit filed today, too bad it wasn't in the years following 1983, when then state Attorney General Joseph Lieberman failed to file a similar lawsuit (even though I was a child who grew up in Connecticut at that time and the same s**t was going on in marketing a product called Humulin). It seems sad how little anything has changed, except that once again, people with diabetes have been overlooked and forgotten!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received this e-mail from a IDDM friend:<br />
&#8220;Eli Lilly adopted a sick marketing mindset: profits over patients, sales over safety,&#8221; Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. &#8220;Through a complex series of illegal rackets and lies, Eli Lilly built a multibillion-dollar drug enterprise at the expense of taxpayers, consumers and patient lives,&#8221; Blumenthal said in a scathing statement. He accused the drugmaker of corrupting doctors, pharmacies and public officials nationwide, &#8220;who easily abandoned integrity and decency for self-enrichment.&#8221; Ironically, this is from a lawsuit filed today, too bad it wasn&#8217;t in the years following 1983, when then state Attorney General Joseph Lieberman failed to file a similar lawsuit (even though I was a child who grew up in Connecticut at that time and the same s**t was going on in marketing a product called Humulin). It seems sad how little anything has changed, except that once again, people with diabetes have been overlooked and forgotten!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-204464</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/03/connecticut-sues-lilly-over-zyprexa/#comment-204464</guid>
		<description>_Assuming_ these accusations were essentially true and proven, I am asking myself whether FDA preemption would prevent such suits, either by states or private litigants.

I assume so, since FDA never said Lilly was not in compliance, as far as I know, and advertising, etc., is part of "the label" as understood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_Assuming_ these accusations were essentially true and proven, I am asking myself whether FDA preemption would prevent such suits, either by states or private litigants.</p>
<p>I assume so, since FDA never said Lilly was not in compliance, as far as I know, and advertising, etc., is part of &#8220;the label&#8221; as understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.153 seconds -->

