Pharma: ‘The Most Effective Lobby On Capitol Hill’
3 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // March 12th, 2008 // 8:12 am
The pharmaceutical industry, long an ally of Republicans, has increasingly worked itself into the good graces of the Democratic Party and by doing so has helped block the Democrats’ top prescription-drug initiatives, The Washington Post writes.
In the year since they took over on Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders have been unable to pass either a bill allowing reimportation of drugs from Canada or a measure requiring negotiation of drug prices under Medicare. And the Post reports that neither bill is likely to reach the president’s desk this year. Lawmakers on both sides of these issues say the primary reason is the influence, now redirected, of the drug lobby.
Drugmakers have gone on a hiring binge, retaining Democratic lobbyists in dozens of major firms. This strategy, which K Streeters call “clogging the system,” prevents adversaries from hiring anyone from those consultancies, according to the Post.
The drug lobby has also wooed Democrats by plowing millions of dollars into helping with another Democratic goal: expanding the children’s health program. In a detente with its traditional foes, pharma joined a group that included AARP and Families USA to buy about $7 million in ads backing the expansion of the program, under which states receive federal money to provide health insurance to families with children.
The industry’s main lobby, PhRMA, paid for most of the group’s budget. “They have all the money,” AARP policy director John Rother tells the Post. “They’re the ones who can write the big checks.”
In years past, when drugmakers leaned heavily Republican, Democrats didn’t have much reason to cut them a break or side with them on policy. Democrats won control of Congress in 2006 in part by accusing Republicans of being too close to drugmakers and other “special interests,” the Post notes. But now that pharmaceutical money is available to both parties, drugmakers have reason to hope for better treatment.
The Democratic takeover of Congress means “we just have more friends than we used to have,” PhRMA president Billy Tauzin, a former Republican congressman from Louisiana, tells the Post. “We’re trying to find more.”
The industry worked closely with the previous Republican-controlled Congress to shape Medicare Part D and include a provision barring the government from negotiating with drugmakers for lower prices, the Post continues. Democratic leaders have wanted to require such negotiation but were stopped initially by GOP resistance and an analysis by federal auditors that found that the impact of negotiation on prices would be small, the paper writes. Ultimately, the measure didn’t resurface because rank-and-file Democrats in Congress were not eager to revisit it.
Democrats had similar reservations about a bill that would legalize reimportation of lower-cost meds from Canada and other countries. Republican opposition and public fear about imports of all sorts, from food to toys, blocked the measure at first. Then, Democratic reluctance about pursuing the matter ended the debate, the Post reminds us.
Most Democratic leaders are still eager to push this legislation, which pharma opposes. “They’ve orchestrated these coalitions and other efforts to improve their public image, but I still get a lot complaints from people that the price of drugs is too high,” Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, tells the paper.
Still, representatives of both the political left and right said the drug lobby’s influence will make that hard. “They are an extremely powerful, effective lobby,” Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana, a conservative Republican who tried and failed to beat the drug lobby on the reimportation issue, tells the paper. Ron Pollack, executive director of the liberal Families USA agreed: “They are the most effective lobby on Capitol Hill right now.”
PhRMA boosted its spending on lobbying last year by 25 percent, to more than $22 million, the Post writes. The increase made the group the second-largest purchaser of lobbying services - which includes both lobbyists and issue advertising - after only the capital’s perennial top spender, the US Chamber of Commerce, according to CQ MoneyLine, which tracks money in politics.
There is more, so please click here…
Justice in Michigan
Thanks for calling our attention to this piece, Ed.
The basic story it tells re: the revolving door, PhRMA’s lobbying tactics, etc. is not new. But it should give pause to anyone who thinks a change of administrations will do much to impact either drug pricing or drug safety. In my view, the highly diluted FDAAA was the clearest sign that - after all the studies, all the hearings, all the everything else - Congress could not be relied upon to make a significant difference, either about the FDA or related issues.
All I can say is - in the House, all of these folks, Democrats and Republicans, are running for reelection. I make no distinction. Clear commitments, and no BS, should be required of each one of them by people who care. And if they are incumbents, every one of them should be held accountable for what they have done, or have not done, already.
Bi-partisan. Equal opportunity. No distinctions.
Sam
It is a shame that over 300 million citizens, men, women and children who
from infrequent use of drugs to using 8 or 9 drugs daily are at the mercy of PHARMA and their lobbyists. The government is suppose to do for people for what the people cannot do for themselves. The people cannot negotiate
lower price from PHARMA and it cannot control the policies and premiums
from insurance companies. It seems that 10 to 20 million people that are
involved with the pharmaceutical and insurance industries control the health
and financial welfare of 300 million people
Former pharma Marketing Exec
Sam,
Thank you for stating this so clearly. But do not forget to remove the 42 million Americans that cannot access healthcare, just imagine what we could do if we cut out all of this graft…