<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A University Clams Up Over A Conflict Of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Former pharma Marketing Exec</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-271447</link>
		<dc:creator>Former pharma Marketing Exec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-271447</guid>
		<description>Justice - Well stated AMEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice - Well stated AMEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270358</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270358</guid>
		<description>FME reminds me of the poignancy of the PPM song which is not entirely irrelevant.  It is about growing up.  Giving up fantasies.  Engaging reality.  A loss of magic; a gain in power (_real_ power) that goes with seasoned integrity.

When we pretend that COIs have no impact, that disclosure is irrelevant, that science can be divorced from power - we are, indeed, still insisting we live in Honah Lee (which I apologize to PPM for spelling incorrectly).

That said, may pirate ships lower their flags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FME reminds me of the poignancy of the PPM song which is not entirely irrelevant.  It is about growing up.  Giving up fantasies.  Engaging reality.  A loss of magic; a gain in power (_real_ power) that goes with seasoned integrity.</p>
<p>When we pretend that COIs have no impact, that disclosure is irrelevant, that science can be divorced from power - we are, indeed, still insisting we live in Honah Lee (which I apologize to PPM for spelling incorrectly).</p>
<p>That said, may pirate ships lower their flags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former pharma Marketing Exec</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270189</link>
		<dc:creator>Former pharma Marketing Exec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270189</guid>
		<description>Puff gives us a piece of truth here (Peter, Paul and Mary claimed the same thing...) They do not verify what the clinicians state as their disclosures.

I was appalled last summer when I was at a major conference and saw that the speaker had nothing to disclose, and of course he was a paid consultant for one of my clients...

One can only ask - Will green scales fall like rain?

All joking aside, if someone says they have no disclosures then they should be ready to hand in a current list of their current published works and any recent speaking engagements of any kind.  It should be mandatory anyway.  

Likewise, I think it is not enough to provide disclosure, the same current list should always be provided.  It should make someone stop and think a bit, and may even help "jog" the memory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puff gives us a piece of truth here (Peter, Paul and Mary claimed the same thing&#8230;) They do not verify what the clinicians state as their disclosures.</p>
<p>I was appalled last summer when I was at a major conference and saw that the speaker had nothing to disclose, and of course he was a paid consultant for one of my clients&#8230;</p>
<p>One can only ask - Will green scales fall like rain?</p>
<p>All joking aside, if someone says they have no disclosures then they should be ready to hand in a current list of their current published works and any recent speaking engagements of any kind.  It should be mandatory anyway.  </p>
<p>Likewise, I think it is not enough to provide disclosure, the same current list should always be provided.  It should make someone stop and think a bit, and may even help &#8220;jog&#8221; the memory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pg</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270027</link>
		<dc:creator>pg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270027</guid>
		<description>LOL to Ed, Insider and Justice :-)

(And to Puff for describing persons with conflicts of interest as "highly principled researchers and clinicians")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL to Ed, Insider and Justice :-)</p>
<p>(And to Puff for describing persons with conflicts of interest as &#8220;highly principled researchers and clinicians&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270009</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-270009</guid>
		<description>Yeah...Ideally, he would have kept frolicking in the autumn mists of a land called Hanna-lee....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;Ideally, he would have kept frolicking in the autumn mists of a land called Hanna-lee&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-269864</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/a-university-clams-up-over-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-269864</guid>
		<description>Is it true?

Their PR person is called Puff!

Puffery at its finest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true?</p>
<p>Their PR person is called Puff!</p>
<p>Puffery at its finest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.150 seconds -->

