<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarinex Patent Fight Nothing To Sneeze At</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/clarinex-patent-fight-nothing-to-sneeze-at/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/clarinex-patent-fight-nothing-to-sneeze-at/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: the condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/clarinex-patent-fight-nothing-to-sneeze-at/#comment-328526</link>
		<dc:creator>the condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13388#comment-328526</guid>
		<description>UPDATED!

McCarter &#38; English, LLP has filed &lt;a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/05/hmmm-does-ashley-work-for-mccarter-and.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Schering's Response in the above case&lt;/a&gt;, tonight -- May 1, 2008.  I've got the goods on it -- and, to cut to the chase, here: I remain unconvinced that Schering has a case.

IMO, Orchid sure seems to have a good one.

So, I think Orchid is going to be able to launch in mid- to late-2008.

Take a look:

http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/05/hmmm-does-ashley-work-for-mccarter-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATED!</p>
<p>McCarter &amp; English, LLP has filed <a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/05/hmmm-does-ashley-work-for-mccarter-and.html" rel="nofollow">Schering&#8217;s Response in the above case</a>, tonight &#8212; May 1, 2008.  I&#8217;ve got the goods on it &#8212; and, to cut to the chase, here: I remain unconvinced that Schering has a case.</p>
<p>IMO, Orchid sure seems to have a good one.</p>
<p>So, I think Orchid is going to be able to launch in mid- to late-2008.</p>
<p>Take a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/05/hmmm-does-ashley-work-for-mccarter-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/05/hmmm-does-ashley-work-for-mccarter-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s a &#8220;Goober Grape&#8221; drug? Just ask Schering-Plough &#38; Merck&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/clarinex-patent-fight-nothing-to-sneeze-at/#comment-324148</link>
		<dc:creator>Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s a &#8220;Goober Grape&#8221; drug? Just ask Schering-Plough &#38; Merck&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13388#comment-324148</guid>
		<description>[...] Combination drugs like these are intended to serve one purpose: to increase the manufacturers&#8217; market share, particularly in the face of impending generic competition. Schering-Plough has been down a road like this already with Claritin &#8212; when Claritin was set to go generic, they introduced Clarinex. Clarinex (desloratidine) is simply a metabolite of Claritin (loratidine) &#8212; in a nutshell, Clarinex is what Claritin becomes in your liver. As one blogger put it, &#8220;if you&#8217;ve taken Claritin, you&#8217;ve taken Clarinex.&#8221; Thankfully, doctors and patients weren&#8217;t really fooled, and sales of Clarinex were never very impressive. I stand corrected! According to this item on Pharmalot, 2007 sales of Clarinex were $799 million! (See &#8220;Clarinex Patent Fight Nothing To Sneeze At&#8220;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Combination drugs like these are intended to serve one purpose: to increase the manufacturers&#8217; market share, particularly in the face of impending generic competition. Schering-Plough has been down a road like this already with Claritin &#8212; when Claritin was set to go generic, they introduced Clarinex. Clarinex (desloratidine) is simply a metabolite of Claritin (loratidine) &#8212; in a nutshell, Clarinex is what Claritin becomes in your liver. As one blogger put it, &#8220;if you&#8217;ve taken Claritin, you&#8217;ve taken Clarinex.&#8221; Thankfully, doctors and patients weren&#8217;t really fooled, and sales of Clarinex were never very impressive. I stand corrected! According to this item on Pharmalot, 2007 sales of Clarinex were $799 million! (See &#8220;Clarinex Patent Fight Nothing To Sneeze At&#8220;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
