<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cough &#038; Cold Maker Barred From Manufacturing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/#comment-356921</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13669#comment-356921</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what needs to be stopped.  Producing, marketing, and taking taxpayer money for unapproved and unlicensed meds is not fraud?  Where are we...China?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what needs to be stopped.  Producing, marketing, and taking taxpayer money for unapproved and unlicensed meds is not fraud?  Where are we&#8230;China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/#comment-356902</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13669#comment-356902</guid>
		<description>Holy cow.  Just read the complaint.  In essence, these folks were manufacturing drugs essentially out of their garage.  These were not "only" generic copies - some were "new."  This is down the road from FDA in Maryland.  FDA inspected the facility in 2006 if not earlier, and issued "compliance guidelines" (which were ignored).

If this can happen down the road from FDA in Maryland, we should certainly not be surprised that what goes on in China and elsewhere may not "come to FDA's attention" - or, if it does, that anything significant will result very soon, if ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow.  Just read the complaint.  In essence, these folks were manufacturing drugs essentially out of their garage.  These were not &#8220;only&#8221; generic copies - some were &#8220;new.&#8221;  This is down the road from FDA in Maryland.  FDA inspected the facility in 2006 if not earlier, and issued &#8220;compliance guidelines&#8221; (which were ignored).</p>
<p>If this can happen down the road from FDA in Maryland, we should certainly not be surprised that what goes on in China and elsewhere may not &#8220;come to FDA&#8217;s attention&#8221; - or, if it does, that anything significant will result very soon, if ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/#comment-356900</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13669#comment-356900</guid>
		<description>I don't know anything about this company, but this may be a good example of when preemption would not apply.  As I read the summary, this company was never in compliance, failed two inspections, etc.  Nonetheless, they were allowed to continue manufacturing drugs through this period.

That said, it does not sound like DOJ is claming fraud (but I have to read complaint).  Needless to say, fraud would apply if company did seek FDA approval in illicit way.  Sounds like these guys mostly just blew FDA off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about this company, but this may be a good example of when preemption would not apply.  As I read the summary, this company was never in compliance, failed two inspections, etc.  Nonetheless, they were allowed to continue manufacturing drugs through this period.</p>
<p>That said, it does not sound like DOJ is claming fraud (but I have to read complaint).  Needless to say, fraud would apply if company did seek FDA approval in illicit way.  Sounds like these guys mostly just blew FDA off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/05/cough-cold-maker-barred-from-manufacturing/#comment-356890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=13669#comment-356890</guid>
		<description>There are a few other companies besides this one who do this type of activity.  Getting an NDC number is easy, and that's all that is needed to get a drug on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few other companies besides this one who do this type of activity.  Getting an NDC number is easy, and that&#8217;s all that is needed to get a drug on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
