FDA To Issue Guidance On Side Effects In Trials
2 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // May 12th, 2008 // 8:29 am
The idea is to distinguish between adverse events and unanticipated problems in clinical trials, and to clarify when problems must be reported to institutional review boards, FDAnews reports.
And after releasing the final guidance, the agency will “probably institute regulatory changes to make it clearer,” Jean Toth-Allen, a biophysicist with the FDA’s Good Clinical Practices Program, told the annual conference of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, according to FDAnews. (Here is the draft guidance from last year).
As you may know, a sponsor must report serious and unexpected adverse events to the FDA. While clinical investigators aren’t required to report adverse events that don’t fall into this category to the IRB, they must record all adverse events on case report forms and submit them to the FDA in annual reports, Toth-Allen told the crowd, according to FDAnews.
The regs on devices stipulate that clinical investigators must report unanticipated adverse device effects within 10 working days to the sponsor and the IRB. In federally funded trials, even a serious adverse event might not have to be reported to HHS’ Office for Human Research Protections if it were anticipated, FDAnews writes, but it still would have to be reported to the FDA.
ol cranky
The biggest problem I’ve encountered with the reporting of AEs in trials are investigators who only want to record those they think are related to the study drug on the Case Report Forms. I can’t tell you how many times I reiterated regulations and protocol requirements about documenting AEs in the source document and CRFs to site staff.
Another problem with the reporting of AEs is the lack of follow up by site staff during studies when subjects aren’t sewn weekly. It’s amazing how many subjects with class IV CHF didn’t suffer so much as a common cold during years of follow-up in clinical trials. . .
Just A Thought
I particularly enjoyed page 6.
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/07d-0106-gdl0001.pdf
It’s not an adverse event!
(”It’s not a tumah” ~Arnold)
If it is an unanticipated problem then it is not an adverse event.
Oh really now, it feels pretty dang adverse to me. I don’t care if you anticipated it or not. Oh wait, no, it’s better to have the unanticipated kind… nope, no adversion here, I’d like my reaction reported now please.
This explains so much.