Comments on: US Attorneys Probe Schering-Plough Over Vytorin

By: SP 2

SP 2 — Mon, 12 May 2008 19:21:12 +0000

I applaud these activities. From what I’ve seen and heard in the past several months, they are absolutely appropriate. There appear to be a lot of questions that need to be answered by Schering-Plough.

By: Fortune Teller

Fortune Teller — Thu, 08 May 2008 18:46:02 +0000

If they keep looking, I’m sure they’ll find plenty of great interest. The worst for SP appears to be yet to come.

By: Peter Rost

Peter Rost — Wed, 07 May 2008 21:24:30 +0000

I can’t help but note that the NJ US assistant attorney was “referred to” http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/ from http://peterrost.blogspot.com/

:))

By: Peter Rost

Peter Rost — Wed, 07 May 2008 21:24:06 +0000

I can’t help but note that the NJ US assistant attorney was “referred to” http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/ from http://peterrost.blogspot.com/ and

:))

By: David

David — Wed, 07 May 2008 14:42:42 +0000

Fred Hassan appears to be a slick spin-master. Fool me once (AHP), shame on you. Fool me twice (Pharmacia), shame on me. Fool me thrice (Schering-Plough), shame on who? It seems that Fred has no shame as evidenced by the information just released regarding his new stock awards on top of what appears to be massive over-payment for the past 5 years!

By: Shadow

Shadow — Wed, 07 May 2008 14:32:08 +0000

Look at that face! Do you trust this man? I know I don’t! It appears that he’s not willing to come clean on anything. It seems that all anybody gets is the runaround. He may make a good used-car salesman, but, in my opinion, he’s done little for Schering-Plough except cut costs and employees everywhere he can.

By: SP 1

SP 1 — Wed, 07 May 2008 14:27:57 +0000

My guess is that there will plenty to find in the HQ facility. I think that they can also find out a whole lot more if they start asking the right questions to the right people. In this case, the right people seem to be the top dogs. And if they are so bold as to deny everything, there’s plenty more that will no doubt be willing to come forth and tell what they know.

By: Solution

Solution — Wed, 07 May 2008 03:48:54 +0000

Pull the top executives in to testify under oath as to what they knew when. They’ll either tell the truth and take responsibility for their actions or they won’t tell the truth and face later charges of perjury. Either way, it’s winess testimony obtained directly from th top dogs in Kenilworth that is needed to break this case.

By: condor

condor — Wed, 07 May 2008 00:35:09 +0000

You are truly a gentleman, AND a scholar, Ed. . . .

A prince among men — thanks for the “mad-props”, man!

Okay everybody be careful out there. . . .

– condor