<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biederman Defender Has Ties To Biederman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perks</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-360354</link>
		<dc:creator>Perks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-360354</guid>
		<description>William, this audio interview may be of help.  It does bring up the issue of non-disclosure by Biederman and colleagues amongst many other things. http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2008/06/20080612_a_main.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, this audio interview may be of help.  It does bring up the issue of non-disclosure by Biederman and colleagues amongst many other things. <a href="http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2008/06/20080612_a_main.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2008/06/20080612_a_main.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-360353</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-360353</guid>
		<description>This is all so sordid.  The foxes guarding the henhouse for a long time now.  Hopefully this will lead to some real reforms, but I will not be holding my breath. Big Pharma is too powerful and too great a contributor to the politicians in the US. 
I have sat in "industry supported symposia" and seen their horrible research and statistics.  I have seen all the psychiatrists nodding and agreeing with the "well known presentor", they don't have a clue as to how poor the research is.  when I have handed in the question cards, mine never gets an answer to the audience as I ask about statistics and p values that skew the results in the direction they want it to go.  All very deceitful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all so sordid.  The foxes guarding the henhouse for a long time now.  Hopefully this will lead to some real reforms, but I will not be holding my breath. Big Pharma is too powerful and too great a contributor to the politicians in the US.<br />
I have sat in &#8220;industry supported symposia&#8221; and seen their horrible research and statistics.  I have seen all the psychiatrists nodding and agreeing with the &#8220;well known presentor&#8221;, they don&#8217;t have a clue as to how poor the research is.  when I have handed in the question cards, mine never gets an answer to the audience as I ask about statistics and p values that skew the results in the direction they want it to go.  All very deceitful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359223</guid>
		<description>Biederman et al have done a great disservice to those trying to better th lives of these seriously ill kids.  It sure doesn't look good for CABF to have at least three of their professional advisory board found to be in bed with big pharma and that big pharma supports them as well.  The Scientologists are going to love this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biederman et al have done a great disservice to those trying to better th lives of these seriously ill kids.  It sure doesn&#8217;t look good for CABF to have at least three of their professional advisory board found to be in bed with big pharma and that big pharma supports them as well.  The Scientologists are going to love this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Van S</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359192</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Van S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359192</guid>
		<description>Atlex,

Bierderman has a defense?.. Thanks for the comment, I had a good laugh!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlex,</p>
<p>Bierderman has a defense?.. Thanks for the comment, I had a good laugh!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Van S</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359191</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Van S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359191</guid>
		<description>Ed,

Interesting post,... I am glad someone exposed this. Why should Ms. Resko be granted immunity from criticism,... heck, folks on this site have questioned my conflicts of interest for quite some tome now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Interesting post,&#8230; I am glad someone exposed this. Why should Ms. Resko be granted immunity from criticism,&#8230; heck, folks on this site have questioned my conflicts of interest for quite some tome now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359075</guid>
		<description>Hi Atlex,

I was just pointing out the connection, which wouldn't have been clear otherwise. Yes, it's unlikely his 'enemies' would rise to his defense, but this was an effort to clarify the status of this particular ally. Just putting things on the table, as it were.

Regards
ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Atlex,</p>
<p>I was just pointing out the connection, which wouldn&#8217;t have been clear otherwise. Yes, it&#8217;s unlikely his &#8216;enemies&#8217; would rise to his defense, but this was an effort to clarify the status of this particular ally. Just putting things on the table, as it were.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359073</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359073</guid>
		<description>There are other people that read this site who have no idea of Biederman's background. This IS news, when this doctor is on national tv selling his theories with altruistic fervor, and the reality of his practice is far from altruistic OR in the patients best interest. I welcome every single discovery about his financial backing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other people that read this site who have no idea of Biederman&#8217;s background. This IS news, when this doctor is on national tv selling his theories with altruistic fervor, and the reality of his practice is far from altruistic OR in the patients best interest. I welcome every single discovery about his financial backing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlex</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-359067</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-359067</guid>
		<description>Ed,

Again, I'm perplexed as to why this is news.  I can understand the initial rpeort; not reporting work-related outside income to one's employer can be news.  But in this case, who do you think would come to Biederman's defense--his enemies?  It would be news if LVS came to his defense.

Atlex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m perplexed as to why this is news.  I can understand the initial rpeort; not reporting work-related outside income to one&#8217;s employer can be news.  But in this case, who do you think would come to Biederman&#8217;s defense&#8211;his enemies?  It would be news if LVS came to his defense.</p>
<p>Atlex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-358950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-358950</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan,

The list of major donors includes Janssen Pharmaceuticals, which is owned by Johnson &#038; Johnson.

ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan,</p>
<p>The list of major donors includes Janssen Pharmaceuticals, which is owned by Johnson &#038; Johnson.</p>
<p>ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/biederman-defender-has-ties-to-biederman/#comment-358946</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14032#comment-358946</guid>
		<description>Where did you get the idea that J&#38;J is a donor?  J&#38;J is *not* listed as a donor on the link above.  Lots of other sponsors including Merck, a church, a women's association, several individuals, and Google.  But not J&#38;J...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get the idea that J&amp;J is a donor?  J&amp;J is *not* listed as a donor on the link above.  Lots of other sponsors including Merck, a church, a women&#8217;s association, several individuals, and Google.  But not J&amp;J&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.157 seconds -->

