<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pharma Says &#8216;What Social Network?&#8217; Fard Explains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Monseau</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358781</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Monseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358781</guid>
		<description>Fascinating discussion here -- and I think Fard provides a good assessment of the current situation.  It is worth noting that the difficulties associated with "joining the conversation" aren't just limited to companies involved in healthcare.  Beyond regulatory or legal concerns, there is the little matter of learning (or relearning) how to engage in a two-way conversation - which is no small feat for businesses that have grown used to "broadcasting" messages.  To do so requires being more candid and a willingness to take the chaff along with the wheat.  To be sure, it isn't easy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating discussion here &#8212; and I think Fard provides a good assessment of the current situation.  It is worth noting that the difficulties associated with &#8220;joining the conversation&#8221; aren&#8217;t just limited to companies involved in healthcare.  Beyond regulatory or legal concerns, there is the little matter of learning (or relearning) how to engage in a two-way conversation - which is no small feat for businesses that have grown used to &#8220;broadcasting&#8221; messages.  To do so requires being more candid and a willingness to take the chaff along with the wheat.  To be sure, it isn&#8217;t easy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Sal Giorgianni</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Sal Giorgianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358533</guid>
		<description>This social networking thing is a bad idea.  

Some decades ago PhARMA opened up a big shining Pandora’s Box wrapped up with a “Direct To Consumer Advertising” bow, in a bow to information-access-advocates and, yes, even some “power through information to the people” activists.  Now, I doubt any feel that this played out the way anyone wanted it to.  

I believe a similar box is now being presented to the industry by folks in the social-networking business (and they do make some $$ here folks); I hope the industry does not open this box too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This social networking thing is a bad idea.  </p>
<p>Some decades ago PhARMA opened up a big shining Pandora’s Box wrapped up with a “Direct To Consumer Advertising” bow, in a bow to information-access-advocates and, yes, even some “power through information to the people” activists.  Now, I doubt any feel that this played out the way anyone wanted it to.  </p>
<p>I believe a similar box is now being presented to the industry by folks in the social-networking business (and they do make some $$ here folks); I hope the industry does not open this box too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358103</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358103</guid>
		<description>I can imagine a blog by Eli Lilly now.  It would look like one of their PR releases.  And they wouldn't respond to an inquiry or question, the same way they don't now.  Stiff as a stick; stuck in the seventies, and b-o-r-i-n-g.  None of the Phrmas will do blogs because they have so many lethal secrets to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine a blog by Eli Lilly now.  It would look like one of their PR releases.  And they wouldn&#8217;t respond to an inquiry or question, the same way they don&#8217;t now.  Stiff as a stick; stuck in the seventies, and b-o-r-i-n-g.  None of the Phrmas will do blogs because they have so many lethal secrets to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358098</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358098</guid>
		<description>The degree of oversight by the General Counsel's office would make the creation ans ongoing operation of a blog impracticable.  Toss in the External Affairs' &#38; Government Affairs' input, the information would be banal at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The degree of oversight by the General Counsel&#8217;s office would make the creation ans ongoing operation of a blog impracticable.  Toss in the External Affairs&#8217; &amp; Government Affairs&#8217; input, the information would be banal at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358087</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358087</guid>
		<description>This issue was vetted a decade ago.  Attorneys would take any sentence they could to hang a drug company with it.

~35% of Americans are treated for the condition they have... that, unfortunately, hasn't changed in a decade either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue was vetted a decade ago.  Attorneys would take any sentence they could to hang a drug company with it.</p>
<p>~35% of Americans are treated for the condition they have&#8230; that, unfortunately, hasn&#8217;t changed in a decade either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Holford</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358086</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Holford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358086</guid>
		<description>I don't think any company could ever write a blog, simply because, with the attendant interest in suppressing information, it would lack authenticity, and would have the well-vetted look of an officially-sanctioned press release.  In fact, the Worshipful Company's objectives represent the very antithesis of what the blog has come to represent, I think.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think any company could ever write a blog, simply because, with the attendant interest in suppressing information, it would lack authenticity, and would have the well-vetted look of an officially-sanctioned press release.  In fact, the Worshipful Company&#8217;s objectives represent the very antithesis of what the blog has come to represent, I think.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/pharma-says-what-social-network-fard-explains/#comment-358081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14000#comment-358081</guid>
		<description>The Prevention of Ignorance

Historically, information sources provided to American citizens were limited due to the few methods available to the public.  And also this information was subject to being filtered and, in some cases, delayed.  This occurred for a number of reasons, which included political ones.
Now, and with great elation, there is the internet.
Soon after the advent of the internet, web logs were created, that are termed ‘blogs’.  At that time, about a decade ago, the blogs were referred to as personal journals or diaries visible on line.  As time passed, blogs became a media medium, and blog communities evolved on topics that often were not addressed in mainstream media.  In addition, blogs provide immediate contributions by others instead of the cumbersomeness of opinion and editorial pieces historically and not always presented in such media forms as newspapers.  The authors of blogs vary as far as their backgrounds and intent of what they present are, just as with other media forms.  Furthermore, they are not exonerated from the legalities of what is written, such as cases of libel.  While we can presume that they like to write, they may not be quality writers.
Yet presently,  blogs have become quite a driving force for those with objectives often opposed by others, and are a threat to big business and politics both who presently monitor the progress and content of blogs that provide instant information on events, which might affect their image and activities not yet exposed.
This includes information released from whistleblowers
While one disadvantage of blogs is the potential lack of reliability, blogs however do allow the posting of documents that typically are not created for view of others besides perhaps a select few.  For example, blogger Dr. Peter Rost, a whistleblower himself,  not long ago posted a newsletter on his blog site given to him by pharmaceutical maker AstraZeneca employees who called themselves the ‘AZ Group of Seven’ to bring to the attention to others the illegal activity of off-label promotion of one of their cancer drugs.  Yet this is not what caught the attention of so many with all of the content of this newsletter.  It was instead a comment stated by former regional AZ manager Mike Zubalagga, who in this newsletter referred to doctors’ offices as ‘buckets of money’.  Again, the statement was authentic and in writing in this newsletter.
Mr. Zubalagga was fired the next day due to this comment.  His manager resigned soon afterwards.
And there have been other whistleblower blog cases in addition to this one, so blogs have become a very powerful and threatening medium of information release that does not allow others to prevent such releases.  This is true freedom of information, free of alteration or omission.  One step closer to social utopia. 
Yet again, the information on these blogs should not be taken as absolute truth without proof to verify claims that may be made.  Of course, documents that are authentic are in fact proof, as illustrated with the above example.  And this, in my opinion, is the blog’s greatest value, combined with the comments on blogs from the growing number of readers who are allowed to contribute to the subject matter so quickly, which fuels the objectives of the blogs.  
Because we, the public, have a right to know what we are entitled to know and what we want to know.  This is especially true if the information could potentially be adverse to our well-being.

“Information is the seed of an idea, and only grows when it’s watered.” --- Heinz V. Berger

Dan Abshear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Prevention of Ignorance</p>
<p>Historically, information sources provided to American citizens were limited due to the few methods available to the public.  And also this information was subject to being filtered and, in some cases, delayed.  This occurred for a number of reasons, which included political ones.<br />
Now, and with great elation, there is the internet.<br />
Soon after the advent of the internet, web logs were created, that are termed ‘blogs’.  At that time, about a decade ago, the blogs were referred to as personal journals or diaries visible on line.  As time passed, blogs became a media medium, and blog communities evolved on topics that often were not addressed in mainstream media.  In addition, blogs provide immediate contributions by others instead of the cumbersomeness of opinion and editorial pieces historically and not always presented in such media forms as newspapers.  The authors of blogs vary as far as their backgrounds and intent of what they present are, just as with other media forms.  Furthermore, they are not exonerated from the legalities of what is written, such as cases of libel.  While we can presume that they like to write, they may not be quality writers.<br />
Yet presently,  blogs have become quite a driving force for those with objectives often opposed by others, and are a threat to big business and politics both who presently monitor the progress and content of blogs that provide instant information on events, which might affect their image and activities not yet exposed.<br />
This includes information released from whistleblowers<br />
While one disadvantage of blogs is the potential lack of reliability, blogs however do allow the posting of documents that typically are not created for view of others besides perhaps a select few.  For example, blogger Dr. Peter Rost, a whistleblower himself,  not long ago posted a newsletter on his blog site given to him by pharmaceutical maker AstraZeneca employees who called themselves the ‘AZ Group of Seven’ to bring to the attention to others the illegal activity of off-label promotion of one of their cancer drugs.  Yet this is not what caught the attention of so many with all of the content of this newsletter.  It was instead a comment stated by former regional AZ manager Mike Zubalagga, who in this newsletter referred to doctors’ offices as ‘buckets of money’.  Again, the statement was authentic and in writing in this newsletter.<br />
Mr. Zubalagga was fired the next day due to this comment.  His manager resigned soon afterwards.<br />
And there have been other whistleblower blog cases in addition to this one, so blogs have become a very powerful and threatening medium of information release that does not allow others to prevent such releases.  This is true freedom of information, free of alteration or omission.  One step closer to social utopia.<br />
Yet again, the information on these blogs should not be taken as absolute truth without proof to verify claims that may be made.  Of course, documents that are authentic are in fact proof, as illustrated with the above example.  And this, in my opinion, is the blog’s greatest value, combined with the comments on blogs from the growing number of readers who are allowed to contribute to the subject matter so quickly, which fuels the objectives of the blogs.<br />
Because we, the public, have a right to know what we are entitled to know and what we want to know.  This is especially true if the information could potentially be adverse to our well-being.</p>
<p>“Information is the seed of an idea, and only grows when it’s watered.” &#8212; Heinz V. Berger</p>
<p>Dan Abshear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.157 seconds -->

