A California jury found the drugmaker not liable in a $1 billion lawsuit involving an 11 year-old girl who claimed she was blinded by using Children’s Motrin, Reuters reports.

The decisions comes less than a month after an emotional trial in which a California couple sued the drugmaker for allegedly hiding serious adverse events from the FDA when it sought to market the widely used pain reliever, which contains ibuprofen.

Sabrina Johnson was 6 years old in 2003 when her parents gave her three doses of Motrin to fight a mild fever, but developed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, a rare, severe allergic reaction to the children’s over-the-counter medication.

The jury voted 9-3 against liability, finding for the the 11-year-old girl and her parents in seven of eight issues, but decided that the ninth - that Children’s Motrin caused the injury - was not proven. “There will be no award,” Browne Green, an attorney for the plaintiffs told reporters. The family sought $14 million in actual damages, $103 million for the girl’s and the family’s pain and suffering, and punitive damages of $950 million.

The girl had testified that the undersides of her eyelids felt like sandpaper and that she spent months in a large cardboard box during daylight hours to avoid intense pain in her eyes.

Stevens-Johnson and toxic epidermal necrolysis, a related ailment, are very rare, with about two to three cases per million people reported annually in Europe and the United States.