<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merck Drops Law Firm In Vioxx Case Over Recusal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/merck-drops-law-firm-in-vioxx-case-over-recusal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/merck-drops-law-firm-in-vioxx-case-over-recusal/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/merck-drops-law-firm-in-vioxx-case-over-recusal/#comment-366740</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=14639#comment-366740</guid>
		<description>Fascinating. Just as Merck lets him go, Schering (Merck's Vytorin-ENHANCE partner), hires him. . .

Said more plainly, on the flip-side, late last week, Lowenstein's Eakeley was ADDED to the Schering-Plough/Organon False Claims Act/Qui Tam defense team, when Arent Fox withdrew, on Thursday/Friday. Arent Fox had defended the matter since long before the acquisition of Organon, by Schering. That said, Schering is a very heavy-user of Lowenstein Sandler PC lawyers in defense of its various bundles of litigation. And so, perhaps it was all a "steamlining" move.

Do take a look:

http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/far-be-it-for-me-to-suggest-these-two.html

Also, Lowenstein's Eakeley was the lawyer signing the affidavits for Schering's motion to dismiss -- in Cain v. Hassan, last night -- the putative shareholders' derivative action (ENHANCE version 2008). Here that is:

http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/review-of-scherings-motion-to-dismiss.html

Cheers! Good stuff, Ed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating. Just as Merck lets him go, Schering (Merck&#8217;s Vytorin-ENHANCE partner), hires him. . .</p>
<p>Said more plainly, on the flip-side, late last week, Lowenstein&#8217;s Eakeley was ADDED to the Schering-Plough/Organon False Claims Act/Qui Tam defense team, when Arent Fox withdrew, on Thursday/Friday. Arent Fox had defended the matter since long before the acquisition of Organon, by Schering. That said, Schering is a very heavy-user of Lowenstein Sandler PC lawyers in defense of its various bundles of litigation. And so, perhaps it was all a &#8220;steamlining&#8221; move.</p>
<p>Do take a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/far-be-it-for-me-to-suggest-these-two.html" rel="nofollow">http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/far-be-it-for-me-to-suggest-these-two.html</a></p>
<p>Also, Lowenstein&#8217;s Eakeley was the lawyer signing the affidavits for Schering&#8217;s motion to dismiss &#8212; in Cain v. Hassan, last night &#8212; the putative shareholders&#8217; derivative action (ENHANCE version 2008). Here that is:</p>
<p><a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/review-of-scherings-motion-to-dismiss.html" rel="nofollow">http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/07/review-of-scherings-motion-to-dismiss.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers! Good stuff, Ed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.150 seconds -->

