<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Approves Novartis Eye Drug With A Twist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: elliottg</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/#comment-370456</link>
		<dc:creator>elliottg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15193#comment-370456</guid>
		<description>Except Genentech didn't do that work.  Only after the eye doctors did the work for them, did they reformulate the drug, threaten to cut off the cheaper supply and raise the price by 2 orders of magnitude.  So if that's your argument, then the answer is Genentech and Novartis do NOT deserve the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except Genentech didn&#8217;t do that work.  Only after the eye doctors did the work for them, did they reformulate the drug, threaten to cut off the cheaper supply and raise the price by 2 orders of magnitude.  So if that&#8217;s your argument, then the answer is Genentech and Novartis do NOT deserve the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack2</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/#comment-370454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15193#comment-370454</guid>
		<description>The hard part of a drug design usually isn't the manufacturing.  It's figuring out what the drug can treat, and then proving the drug treats that condition.  Considering so many drugs don't make it, shouldn't companies make money when they do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hard part of a drug design usually isn&#8217;t the manufacturing.  It&#8217;s figuring out what the drug can treat, and then proving the drug treats that condition.  Considering so many drugs don&#8217;t make it, shouldn&#8217;t companies make money when they do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliottg</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/#comment-370451</link>
		<dc:creator>elliottg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15193#comment-370451</guid>
		<description>oops.  Avastin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops.  Avastin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliottg</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/#comment-370440</link>
		<dc:creator>elliottg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15193#comment-370440</guid>
		<description>What about Avantis?  Novartis has some good PR people if they kept this aspect out of the story.  The charge for Lucentis is extortion and is just a variation on the "your money or your life".  Here it is "your money or your sight".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Avantis?  Novartis has some good PR people if they kept this aspect out of the story.  The charge for Lucentis is extortion and is just a variation on the &#8220;your money or your life&#8221;.  Here it is &#8220;your money or your sight&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack2</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/uk-approves-novartis-eye-drug-with-a-twist/#comment-370424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15193#comment-370424</guid>
		<description>There may be something unique to the specifics of this cost-sharing agreement, but NICE and Pharma have already agreed to risk sharing agreements, where NICE only pays when the drug works (eg beta-interferons, cancer treatments).


http://pharmexec.findpharma.com/pharmexec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=507990&#38;sk=&#38;date=&#38;%0A%09%09%09&#38;pageID=2&#38;searchString=Velcade%20NICE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be something unique to the specifics of this cost-sharing agreement, but NICE and Pharma have already agreed to risk sharing agreements, where NICE only pays when the drug works (eg beta-interferons, cancer treatments).</p>
<p><a href="http://pharmexec.findpharma.com/pharmexec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=507990&amp;sk=&amp;date=&amp;%0A%09%09%09&amp;pageID=2&amp;searchString=Velcade%20NICE" rel="nofollow">http://pharmexec.findpharma.com/pharmexec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=507990&amp;sk=&amp;date=&amp;%0A%09%09%09&amp;pageID=2&amp;searchString=Velcade%20NICE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
