Vioxx Lawyers’ Fees Capped At $1.56 Billion

5 Comments

vioxxlawsuits3The federal judge overseeing much of the Vioxx litigation capped fees for plaintiffs’ lawyers at a relatively low 32 per cent of the $4.85 billion settlement in order to ensure fees are reasonable, The Associated Press reports.

US District Judge Elden Fallon decided that, while the limit is below the usual 33.3 per cent to 40 per cent lawyers collect when they take cases on a contingency, the payment won’t result in “a paltry award” for the lawyers. “Limiting attorneys’ fees to 32 per cent of the net recovery means that the attorneys in this case will receive more than $1.55 billion,” Fallon wrote in a 21-page order.

The judge gave several reasons for the limit, noting the global settlement reached last November streamlined the work of the participating attorneys. He wrote that he had an increased responsibility to keep fees reasonable because most of the claimants are elderly and frail after having “suffered life-threatening injuries” - or they are survivors of people who died of a heart attack or stroke. And so they may not have been able to negotiate the most favourable contracts with lawyers, the AP writes.

Before you continue reading, what do you think of the decision?

Is $1.56 billion reasonable?

  • Yes (50%, 70 Votes)
  • No (50%, 69 Votes)

Total Voters: 139

Loading ... Loading ...

Please continue…

Fallon also ruled that hundreds of attorneys representing about 50,000 Vioxx claimants participating in the settlement can recover reasonable costs. Altogether, 871 law firms are involved in the litigation, which began about the time Merck pulled the painkiller from the market in September 2004 after its own research showed it doubled risk of heart attack and stroke, the AP continues.

A much smaller group of law firms that pulled together thousands of documents under a pretrial discovery process that Fallon co-ordinated will receive additional fees above the 32 per cent. But the judge stressed that those extra amounts, still to be determined, will come from the other attorneys - not from the claimants.

The first partial cheques from the settlement fund are to be sent beginning tomorrow by the firm administering the claims. Those amounts, roughly 40 per cent of expected final settlements for claimants, will go into escrow accounts temporarily. Claimants will get their portion after deduction of lawyer’s fees and any claims by insurers seeking reimbursement for medical care they covered for Vioxx users. The first payments are only for heart attack cases; payments for stroke cases are set to begin in February.

Source: The Associated Press

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. Although not consistent with question I voted No because unreasonable that the lawyers would get so high of a percentage

  2. Is USD1.56 reasonable? The poll question is not a good one without qualification. It is not reasonable because it is TOO MUCH! I don`t believe the attorneys come close to earning that amount. That is the problem with our society!

  3. It’s all relative.
    The lawyers get so much and patients get so little.
    It all seems like a blackmail scheme by lawyers rather than a trie patient benefit thing.

  4. Does anyone know if the health insurer/PBM attorneys who represent the insurance companies who are invoking subrogation clauses also included in this 32% cap? If not, are they paid out of remaining claimant amounts for their work in collecting subrogation amounts from the survivors?

  5. I understood the 40% would go to the people who got hurt by vioxx. Later the 60%would pay the lawyers and medicare and other insurance companies back what it cost them. I wonder since Medicare decides what they will pay for a service if that means we pay that amount or do we pay what we would have to pay if we were rich enough to pay for a by-pass surgery. I had to be opened up 2 times to fix me back to half normal. Guess I will pay for the 2 surguries. I also have DEAD heart tissue that does not work and causes me not to be the same person I was before vioxx. Any one know for sure when or what we will get? If the lawyer gets 32% and the medicare and insurance companies get paid out of our first payment the figures don’t add up. We would not have enough to pay for all of this. Would we??????

Leave a Comment

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/