<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Makes Schering-Plough Stock &#8216;Radioactive&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371134</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371134</guid>
		<description>The negative press coverage is a result of the inexperience of the head of communications. Someone needs to take control of the situation and help this guy out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The negative press coverage is a result of the inexperience of the head of communications. Someone needs to take control of the situation and help this guy out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371096</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371096</guid>
		<description>Watch the clip if you haven't.  Cramer repeats that the reporting is all accurate, that Berenson is great, that, if he were Berenson, "I would do the same thing," etc.

But there are just too many bad stories, in his view, for the drug to survive.  The FDA will be forced to pull it.  No mention of their pulling Zetia also. 

It may or may not be a good investment, but the notion of FDA pulling it (unless there is more into "stocked away" (so to speak) somewhere, makes no sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the clip if you haven&#8217;t.  Cramer repeats that the reporting is all accurate, that Berenson is great, that, if he were Berenson, &#8220;I would do the same thing,&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>But there are just too many bad stories, in his view, for the drug to survive.  The FDA will be forced to pull it.  No mention of their pulling Zetia also. </p>
<p>It may or may not be a good investment, but the notion of FDA pulling it (unless there is more into &#8220;stocked away&#8221; (so to speak) somewhere, makes no sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371092</link>
		<dc:creator>Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371092</guid>
		<description>Hell must be freezing over. I find myself in agreement with both Cramer and Condor today. Cramer is right that "the companies have not shown much dexterity in their handling of the problem" and Condor is also right to say that Cramer "is a side-show-tent freak". He makes some horrible stock picks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell must be freezing over. I find myself in agreement with both Cramer and Condor today. Cramer is right that &#8220;the companies have not shown much dexterity in their handling of the problem&#8221; and Condor is also right to say that Cramer &#8220;is a side-show-tent freak&#8221;. He makes some horrible stock picks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SP 2</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371077</link>
		<dc:creator>SP 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371077</guid>
		<description>Maybe God is simply angry with these bozos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe God is simply angry with these bozos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former SP</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371054</link>
		<dc:creator>Former SP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371054</guid>
		<description>No, the actions of the top management team have made the stock "radioactive."  They have made mistake after mistake after mistake, guided by their over-whelming greed, and deserve what they get.  Hopefully, justice will eventually be served, but here's betting they slither out of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the actions of the top management team have made the stock &#8220;radioactive.&#8221;  They have made mistake after mistake after mistake, guided by their over-whelming greed, and deserve what they get.  Hopefully, justice will eventually be served, but here&#8217;s betting they slither out of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371049</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371049</guid>
		<description>Cramer? The guy is a side-show-tent freak.

A carnie. A huckster. Nothing more.

Let's review his history -- just with Schering-Plough picks (forgetting ALL the other times he's been wrong -- about other stocks): at $26.30, he called it "cheap" -- told people to "back up the truck" (Buy loads of the stock). And, his rationale? "Fred Hassan is my neighbor. I like him."

At $22 -- He called SGP a "screaming buy" -- again said the press was wrong about the stock.

At $16 -- "Time to Buy" (The stock did recover from here, but not for any of the reasons Cramer cited.)

Finally, now -- at $18.90 -- he sells. What? He had long ago said his trust bought a bunch at $26 and change.

Well -- THAT'S a guy whose advice I'd want to follow. Not.

BTW, Huckman at CNBC has a good one -- as does Matt Herper -- yet ANOTHER great piece in Forbes this morning, on Vytorin study's ethical "morass" -- do take a look:

http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/09/vytorin-studys-ethical-morass-forbes.html

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer? The guy is a side-show-tent freak.</p>
<p>A carnie. A huckster. Nothing more.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s review his history &#8212; just with Schering-Plough picks (forgetting ALL the other times he&#8217;s been wrong &#8212; about other stocks): at $26.30, he called it &#8220;cheap&#8221; &#8212; told people to &#8220;back up the truck&#8221; (Buy loads of the stock). And, his rationale? &#8220;Fred Hassan is my neighbor. I like him.&#8221;</p>
<p>At $22 &#8212; He called SGP a &#8220;screaming buy&#8221; &#8212; again said the press was wrong about the stock.</p>
<p>At $16 &#8212; &#8220;Time to Buy&#8221; (The stock did recover from here, but not for any of the reasons Cramer cited.)</p>
<p>Finally, now &#8212; at $18.90 &#8212; he sells. What? He had long ago said his trust bought a bunch at $26 and change.</p>
<p>Well &#8212; THAT&#8217;S a guy whose advice I&#8217;d want to follow. Not.</p>
<p>BTW, Huckman at CNBC has a good one &#8212; as does Matt Herper &#8212; yet ANOTHER great piece in Forbes this morning, on Vytorin study&#8217;s ethical &#8220;morass&#8221; &#8212; do take a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/09/vytorin-studys-ethical-morass-forbes.html" rel="nofollow">http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2008/09/vytorin-studys-ethical-morass-forbes.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Holford</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/09/media-makes-schering-plough-stock-radioactive/#comment-371036</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Holford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=15268#comment-371036</guid>
		<description>No doubt Jim Cramer is a financially successful guy, but I don't think much of his due diligence!  Bad press is the thing that made him bail out?  Surely, if the companies were any good, then the stock would recover, or is it the case that he just think everybody else will be impacted by the bad press, and sell, whereupon his portfolio will suffer severe losses, which will not be recovered for some time; longer than he's prepared to wait, in fact?

Thing is, if the companies have engaged in dubious activities to get their product sold, then it's likely that that's a modus operandi that it follows, regularly.  And it's a big "if," because I haven't looked at this story, at all, let alone in any depth.  But I'll bet you that Cramer has.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt Jim Cramer is a financially successful guy, but I don&#8217;t think much of his due diligence!  Bad press is the thing that made him bail out?  Surely, if the companies were any good, then the stock would recover, or is it the case that he just think everybody else will be impacted by the bad press, and sell, whereupon his portfolio will suffer severe losses, which will not be recovered for some time; longer than he&#8217;s prepared to wait, in fact?</p>
<p>Thing is, if the companies have engaged in dubious activities to get their product sold, then it&#8217;s likely that that&#8217;s a modus operandi that it follows, regularly.  And it&#8217;s a big &#8220;if,&#8221; because I haven&#8217;t looked at this story, at all, let alone in any depth.  But I&#8217;ll bet you that Cramer has.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
