<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDA Warns Amgen Over DTC Brochure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maroha</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/#comment-379887</link>
		<dc:creator>Maroha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17086#comment-379887</guid>
		<description>Compliance A.
I was a wee bit suspicious at the 50K letters too. So I did a search of FDA DDMAC warning letters in the last three years at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/wlcfm/export_report_excel.cfm

But I found different results: 2008 first 3 quarters (33 letters), 2007 (2), 2006 (0).

Here were the 2007 letters:
Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Dec 13, 2007	Center for Drug Evaluation and Research	DDMAC/Promotional Claims False &#38; Misleading/Misbranded

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.	Dec 10, 2007	Center for Drug Evaluation and Research	DDMAC/Promotional Claims False &#38; Misleading/Misbranded

Seems strange that these numbers are all over the place.  What's driving them?  Some extra time on DDMAC's hands?

Also, are you counting warnings from divisions other than DDMAC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compliance A.<br />
I was a wee bit suspicious at the 50K letters too. So I did a search of FDA DDMAC warning letters in the last three years at <a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/wlcfm/export_report_excel.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/wlcfm/export_report_excel.cfm</a></p>
<p>But I found different results: 2008 first 3 quarters (33 letters), 2007 (2), 2006 (0).</p>
<p>Here were the 2007 letters:<br />
Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Dec 13, 2007	Center for Drug Evaluation and Research	DDMAC/Promotional Claims False &amp; Misleading/Misbranded</p>
<p>Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.	Dec 10, 2007	Center for Drug Evaluation and Research	DDMAC/Promotional Claims False &amp; Misleading/Misbranded</p>
<p>Seems strange that these numbers are all over the place.  What&#8217;s driving them?  Some extra time on DDMAC&#8217;s hands?</p>
<p>Also, are you counting warnings from divisions other than DDMAC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MidwestRebel</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/#comment-379711</link>
		<dc:creator>MidwestRebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17086#comment-379711</guid>
		<description>Amen, amen, Pharmalot.  Pharma KNOWS the rules and thumbs their collectives noses at them, repeatedly.  If they DON'T know the rules, they should lose their license to operate.  

Also, if the FDA can't/won't be vigilant and excercise their authority to the full extent of the law, defund their budget of taxpayer dollars.  Let's face it...with few exceptions, the FDA's budget seems to be spent protecting the industry, NOT consumers.

As with kids, if there are no consequences for disobedience, you may as well save your breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, amen, Pharmalot.  Pharma KNOWS the rules and thumbs their collectives noses at them, repeatedly.  If they DON&#8217;T know the rules, they should lose their license to operate.  </p>
<p>Also, if the FDA can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t be vigilant and excercise their authority to the full extent of the law, defund their budget of taxpayer dollars.  Let&#8217;s face it&#8230;with few exceptions, the FDA&#8217;s budget seems to be spent protecting the industry, NOT consumers.</p>
<p>As with kids, if there are no consequences for disobedience, you may as well save your breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compliance Analyst</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/#comment-379689</link>
		<dc:creator>Compliance Analyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17086#comment-379689</guid>
		<description>Doing a quick search for the last two years of warning letters, it appears that it would be closer to 50 rather than 50,000.  Here is a summary of DDMAC warning letters for the past say 10 years:
YEAR   # OF DDMAC WARNING LETTERS

2008   13  (first 3 quarters only)
2007   20   
2006   22
2005   29
2004   23
2003   25
2002   28
2001   64
2000   75
1999   108
1998   156
1997   139

Based on that there haven't been 50,000 (let alone 1000) in the past 10 years.  I always prefer to work with facts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing a quick search for the last two years of warning letters, it appears that it would be closer to 50 rather than 50,000.  Here is a summary of DDMAC warning letters for the past say 10 years:<br />
YEAR   # OF DDMAC WARNING LETTERS</p>
<p>2008   13  (first 3 quarters only)<br />
2007   20<br />
2006   22<br />
2005   29<br />
2004   23<br />
2003   25<br />
2002   28<br />
2001   64<br />
2000   75<br />
1999   108<br />
1998   156<br />
1997   139</p>
<p>Based on that there haven&#8217;t been 50,000 (let alone 1000) in the past 10 years.  I always prefer to work with facts&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssmith</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/#comment-379684</link>
		<dc:creator>ssmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17086#comment-379684</guid>
		<description>Dictionary definition
DTC: testing limits of credible marketing - because you can never have enough Viagra / Cialis ads....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dictionary definition<br />
DTC: testing limits of credible marketing - because you can never have enough Viagra / Cialis ads&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan A.</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/fda-warns-amgen-over-dtc-brochure/#comment-379679</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17086#comment-379679</guid>
		<description>I understand that the FDA issues nearly 50 thousand warning letters to drug companies for such activities every year, which clearly is not a deterrent, and likely an attempt to pacify the public with the perception of fictional regulationn by the FDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that the FDA issues nearly 50 thousand warning letters to drug companies for such activities every year, which clearly is not a deterrent, and likely an attempt to pacify the public with the perception of fictional regulationn by the FDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->

