<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NJ Supreme Court To Hear Vioxx Preemption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/#comment-378472</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=16496#comment-378472</guid>
		<description>Yes, I survived despite many strokes, and cardiac arrests! Living with the damage, to tell the true story of Vioxx's harmful effects! There is just two questions for Merck and "Public Trust" to answer: 
Are lives worth the deceptive practices for profit? How many lives are too many?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I survived despite many strokes, and cardiac arrests! Living with the damage, to tell the true story of Vioxx&#8217;s harmful effects! There is just two questions for Merck and &#8220;Public Trust&#8221; to answer:<br />
Are lives worth the deceptive practices for profit? How many lives are too many?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/#comment-378465</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=16496#comment-378465</guid>
		<description>Congressman Dr. Tom Coburn prescribed my vioxx in massive dosages 2-4 25mg tablets daily, as a general pain anesthetic. He totally misdiagnoised side effects, consults with Merck Pharmacoligist failed to inform him of these effects. Many of his terminally ill patients may not have expired as a result of their known diagnosis!! He also denied to help many "Faith Base Initative" patients SSI help in lew of a prayer and poison pill! We have letters on U. S. House of Representative stationary to say, "...my constitiency will not allow my assistance in your S.S.I. application"., or "appeal", as the case was for many of us on "death row"...His clinic's waiting room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressman Dr. Tom Coburn prescribed my vioxx in massive dosages 2-4 25mg tablets daily, as a general pain anesthetic. He totally misdiagnoised side effects, consults with Merck Pharmacoligist failed to inform him of these effects. Many of his terminally ill patients may not have expired as a result of their known diagnosis!! He also denied to help many &#8220;Faith Base Initative&#8221; patients SSI help in lew of a prayer and poison pill! We have letters on U. S. House of Representative stationary to say, &#8220;&#8230;my constitiency will not allow my assistance in your S.S.I. application&#8221;., or &#8220;appeal&#8221;, as the case was for many of us on &#8220;death row&#8221;&#8230;His clinic&#8217;s waiting room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VICTIM@ 47,987</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/#comment-377962</link>
		<dc:creator>VICTIM@ 47,987</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=16496#comment-377962</guid>
		<description>THE BS SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE REDONE CORRECTLY...PEOPLE ARE GETTING DINGED FOR RISKS THEY HAD WHEN IT WAS PRESCRIBED...FACE IT,MERCK SCREWED UP AND NEEDS TO PAY THE PEOPLE THEY HARMED..THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER AS IT IS.
SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE 20 BILLION WITH NO PENALTIES..

AS IT STANDS NOW THEY ARE PENALIZING PEOPLE THAT STARTED TAKING MEDS THAT THEY WHERE PUT ON AFTER THEIR HEART ATTACK JUST BECAUSE THE DOCTORS ALWAYS PUT PEOPLE ON THEM AS A PRECAUTION...

THE PSC THAT CAME UP WITH THIS JOKE OF A SETTLEMENT HAD ONLY THIER BEST INTREST IN MIND, THE THE VICTIMS!!!!!

MERCK AND THE PSC SHOULD BE HUNG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE BS SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE REDONE CORRECTLY&#8230;PEOPLE ARE GETTING DINGED FOR RISKS THEY HAD WHEN IT WAS PRESCRIBED&#8230;FACE IT,MERCK SCREWED UP AND NEEDS TO PAY THE PEOPLE THEY HARMED..THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER AS IT IS.<br />
SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE 20 BILLION WITH NO PENALTIES..</p>
<p>AS IT STANDS NOW THEY ARE PENALIZING PEOPLE THAT STARTED TAKING MEDS THAT THEY WHERE PUT ON AFTER THEIR HEART ATTACK JUST BECAUSE THE DOCTORS ALWAYS PUT PEOPLE ON THEM AS A PRECAUTION&#8230;</p>
<p>THE PSC THAT CAME UP WITH THIS JOKE OF A SETTLEMENT HAD ONLY THIER BEST INTREST IN MIND, THE THE VICTIMS!!!!!</p>
<p>MERCK AND THE PSC SHOULD BE HUNG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in MI</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/#comment-377939</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=16496#comment-377939</guid>
		<description>As I go back to links, it looks like Merck is challenging compensatory damages, so the whole case.  This is a much better case in which to hash out preemption than Levine.  Whatever the NJSC decides, I hope it gets to SCOTUS.  But that will probably depend on who is Solcitor General at the time, which will, in turn, depend on who is President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I go back to links, it looks like Merck is challenging compensatory damages, so the whole case.  This is a much better case in which to hash out preemption than Levine.  Whatever the NJSC decides, I hope it gets to SCOTUS.  But that will probably depend on who is Solcitor General at the time, which will, in turn, depend on who is President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in MI</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-vioxx-preemption/#comment-377938</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=16496#comment-377938</guid>
		<description>Onward!  

I'm assuming that the NJ SC will revisit whole case as opposed to just the punitive damages issue.  The latter is the issue that Kent was about - whether a state court can assess fraud on FDA.  I couldn't tell from the link which it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onward!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that the NJ SC will revisit whole case as opposed to just the punitive damages issue.  The latter is the issue that Kent was about - whether a state court can assess fraud on FDA.  I couldn&#8217;t tell from the link which it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->

