Pharma Runs TV Ads For Supportive Lawmakers

1 Comment

The nation’s leading drug makers have underwritten the largest political issue ad campaign on television this election season, spending $13.1 million in the past five weeks on TV spots praising members of Congress who voted to expand a popular federal-state health insurance program for lower-and middle-income children, the Center for Public Integrity reports on its web site.

The ads are paid for by PhRMA and name some politicians locked in tight races, some who are coasting to reelection, and some who are not even running, CPI notes. A spokeswoman for the non-profit running the ads, America’s Agenda: Health Care for Kids, says the idea is not to influence races, but to keep the State Children’s Health Insurance Program at the top of the legislative agenda. So far, the group has singled out 15 House members and 13 senators who voted in favor of expanding SCHIP.

“These are not campaign ads in any way,” she tells CPI. “We’re singling out people who voted on SCHIP in the past who we believe may in some cases be under pressure to change their vote. This is really an issues advertising campaign.” The commercials show photos of the lawmakers and note that they “helped pass health care coverage for uninsured children,” and urge viewers to call and tell the member of Congress “to keep fighting for our kids.”

The SCHIP expansion that failed last fall would have added $7 billion a year to the $5 billion-a-year program, but President Bush issued a veto after arguing the move would push people with private insurance into the government plan, CPI writes. Why does PhRMA care? The industry supported the bill because people with insurance are more likely to visit a doctor, who is more likely to prescribe a med.

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. Rather than subsidizing political campaign advertising, perhaps PhRMA’s money would be better spent subsidizing Medicaid prescriber reimbursement rates.

    Increasing access to Medicaid (i.e. insurance) without ensuring increased access to participating prescribers and dispensers may only serve to make health care access issues worse, particularly in the outpatient setting.

    It might also make sense to have pharmacy reimbursement formulas that incorporate the need for licensed pharmacists working out of licensed pharmacies…

    When is the last time that you saw a politician, lobbyist, or licensed attorney working for the same reimbursement rates as a physician or pharmacist who treats Medicaid patients? Probably never…

Leave a Comment

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Clear

Clear

© 2007- 2008 Newark Morning Ledger Co.  All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/

-->