Big Pharma’s Loss May Be Little Pharma’s Gain
2 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // November 6th, 2008 // 9:14 am
The constant stream of job cuts at large drugmakers is making Signum Biosciences’ search for new employees easier.
“It gives us leverage in terms of negotiating salary,” Maxwell Stock, the biopharma’s president and chief operating officer, tells NJBiz. “If there’s a perception from a potential employee that things are tough (in the job market), the person will tend not to want to negotiate as hard as if the opposite was true. There’s also a wider range of talent out there.”
Indeed, as big drugmakers continue to trim jobs, smaller biopharmaceutical makers and specialty pharma are benefiting from the downsizing, according to David Poling, director of state business operations at Aerotek, a staffing firm.
“It’s a great time for smaller drug companies to strike, in terms of the improving talent pool. It’s usually harder for them to pick up the clinical trial associates, the regulatory affairs managers and the drug safety people they need when the job market is hot,” he tells the mag.
Signum Biosciences plans to hire “four senior-level researchers over the next three or four months,” according to Stock. The company has 28 employees and developing meds and consumer products for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, asthma and skin conditions.
“If I’m a biopharma or specialty pharma company right now, I’m excited because I’ve got more employee prospects, and the ability to find (licensing or development) partners with deeper pockets,” Michael Steiner, head of the pharma group at RegentAtlantic Capital, a wealth management firm, tells NJBiz.
But Steiner, whose clients include executives from Merck, Novartis and Johnson & Johnson, says employees at the bigger drugmakers are “definitely nervous. They’re looking for reassurance of their financial security. They’re taking stock of their entire financial foundation.”
At the same time, there are “tons of opportunities as contractors with companies that provide support services to drugmakers,” he says. “They’re looking to outsource manufacturing, research and development. There’s been a proliferation of CROs,” or contract research organizations, picking up business.
In general, drugmakers like outsourcing because there could be “a lot of down time between projects,” Steiner says. “You might pay more in the short term (for temporary workers), but you don’t have the overhead costs of permanent workers.”
Stock says competition remains keen for highly specialized people. But smaller firms have an ace up their sleeve. “If you get 10,000 stock options at a strike price of $1, and the (privately held) company goes public at $10, your stock is now worth $100,000. That’s not likely to happen at a big pharma company.”
CMC guy
Basically Stock is saying he can get experienced people for cut rate prices and in terms of his stock options statement it is meaningless if company does not survive long enough or can not execute an IPO (which is current market situation).
Working at smaller companies does offer some benefits but there are downsides too and in general the lack having key people at the right time further reduces to chance to develop a successful drug which even Big Pharma struggles with the challenges.
Dunnoh
Truth is that the whole industry is in the crosshairs and its naive to think small is exempt, in fact, risk is exponential since 90% are one-drug-ponies and if they fail in the clinic,,,oh well! see ya!
Companies with cash, revenues and hard assets still beat ones with molecules and targets….