<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life After Andy: Searching For FDA Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: An FDA Reviewer</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380718</link>
		<dc:creator>An FDA Reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380718</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

If I could quit my job and speak I would. However even if I quit my job I still couldn't speak legally.

As for suggestions. There are those in Congress that know what needs to be done. They need the politicaly clout from the public that writes them so they can actually do something.

I'm not going to get into specifics of what pressures and rewards FDA management can bring.  The more I reveal the more likely FDA management will be able to find something I say so they can use it against me. 

An FDA Reviewer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>If I could quit my job and speak I would. However even if I quit my job I still couldn&#8217;t speak legally.</p>
<p>As for suggestions. There are those in Congress that know what needs to be done. They need the politicaly clout from the public that writes them so they can actually do something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to get into specifics of what pressures and rewards FDA management can bring.  The more I reveal the more likely FDA management will be able to find something I say so they can use it against me. </p>
<p>An FDA Reviewer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380714</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380714</guid>
		<description>Reviewer,
1) If someone was working on the plans for Auschwitz I hope that they would quit their job and testify to what they saw/heard.  
2) In your postings, you seem to forget that we ALL want safe drugs to be approved - even those of us in pharma and (almost certainly) those in the management of the FDA.  There are differences of opinions about how to achieve that goal.  I hear complaints from you frequently, but I seldom  (if ever) have heard a viable suggestion on how the present system could be FIXED.  (short of firing all your bosses)  

Do you genuinely believe that those in the management of the FDA wish harm upon people just to pad their pocketbooks?  It’s not even clear to me why they would have any pressure to approve drugs at all.  What kind of pressure can pharma really apply to the FDA?  It’s not as if the FDA (or its managment) gets a cut of drug profits.  Yet that’s the impression you constantly give.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviewer,<br />
1) If someone was working on the plans for Auschwitz I hope that they would quit their job and testify to what they saw/heard.<br />
2) In your postings, you seem to forget that we ALL want safe drugs to be approved - even those of us in pharma and (almost certainly) those in the management of the FDA.  There are differences of opinions about how to achieve that goal.  I hear complaints from you frequently, but I seldom  (if ever) have heard a viable suggestion on how the present system could be FIXED.  (short of firing all your bosses)  </p>
<p>Do you genuinely believe that those in the management of the FDA wish harm upon people just to pad their pocketbooks?  It’s not even clear to me why they would have any pressure to approve drugs at all.  What kind of pressure can pharma really apply to the FDA?  It’s not as if the FDA (or its managment) gets a cut of drug profits.  Yet that’s the impression you constantly give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380713</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380713</guid>
		<description>Nathan -
What would you suggest FDA Reviewer do?  I am certain he would be interested in any ideas you might have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan -<br />
What would you suggest FDA Reviewer do?  I am certain he would be interested in any ideas you might have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An FDA Reviewer</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380711</link>
		<dc:creator>An FDA Reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380711</guid>
		<description>Thank you David.

Nathan,

I love my work and do it ethically.

Would your say the same thing to someone who worked on the plans for Auschwitz, realized what was really going on, and tried to warn the Jews?

From what I have seen I believe that I am in a similar position. However information on drugs are trade secrets and besides the press isn't going to listen.

Unfortunately our government has virtually killed free speech and unless a Congressman or Senator releases information those of us who work in government will be fired, go to jail, and even face the possibility of having ourselves or our family members killed as retaliation for actually speaking out and warning people.

Why do you say anything now when I simply make a statement about what other reviewers have said to me?

Personally I agree with them. I have seen Janet Woodcock do something that I believe actually is criminal. The problem comes down to proving it. I could testify as to what I observed but I simply don't trust that others who observed the same thing to speak the truth.

I don't hate. Instead I have hope. I have hope that maybe, just maybe, that I can help not prevent but minimize another tragedy like Vioxx that is actually occurring right now as I write this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you David.</p>
<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>I love my work and do it ethically.</p>
<p>Would your say the same thing to someone who worked on the plans for Auschwitz, realized what was really going on, and tried to warn the Jews?</p>
<p>From what I have seen I believe that I am in a similar position. However information on drugs are trade secrets and besides the press isn&#8217;t going to listen.</p>
<p>Unfortunately our government has virtually killed free speech and unless a Congressman or Senator releases information those of us who work in government will be fired, go to jail, and even face the possibility of having ourselves or our family members killed as retaliation for actually speaking out and warning people.</p>
<p>Why do you say anything now when I simply make a statement about what other reviewers have said to me?</p>
<p>Personally I agree with them. I have seen Janet Woodcock do something that I believe actually is criminal. The problem comes down to proving it. I could testify as to what I observed but I simply don&#8217;t trust that others who observed the same thing to speak the truth.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hate. Instead I have hope. I have hope that maybe, just maybe, that I can help not prevent but minimize another tragedy like Vioxx that is actually occurring right now as I write this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380710</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380710</guid>
		<description>Dan, no - it's perfectly appropriate.  However, the AMOUNT of dirty laundry is what is strange to me.  I don't see any "hope it might precipitiate some change" -- I only see complaints - not constructive critisism or suggestions - only complaints.  

Maybe I'm totally off-base, but this seems to be a voice of a disgruntled long-time employee frustrated with his/her job but afraid to do something contructive about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, no - it&#8217;s perfectly appropriate.  However, the AMOUNT of dirty laundry is what is strange to me.  I don&#8217;t see any &#8220;hope it might precipitiate some change&#8221; &#8212; I only see complaints - not constructive critisism or suggestions - only complaints.  </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m totally off-base, but this seems to be a voice of a disgruntled long-time employee frustrated with his/her job but afraid to do something contructive about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380705</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380705</guid>
		<description>Nathan - 
So airing dirty laundry with the hope it might precipitate some change is inappropriate in your eyes? 
IMO that is why this industry is in the shape it is - because too many people have been willing to look the other way for too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan -<br />
So airing dirty laundry with the hope it might precipitate some change is inappropriate in your eyes?<br />
IMO that is why this industry is in the shape it is - because too many people have been willing to look the other way for too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380677</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380677</guid>
		<description>An FDA Reviewer,
Do you ever have anything positive to say about your work?  It seems that you just like to air your dirty laudry out here in the open where people are happy to read about it.  But it's seeming more and more likely to me that you are just a disgruntled employee who hates what you do for a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An FDA Reviewer,<br />
Do you ever have anything positive to say about your work?  It seems that you just like to air your dirty laudry out here in the open where people are happy to read about it.  But it&#8217;s seeming more and more likely to me that you are just a disgruntled employee who hates what you do for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380673</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380673</guid>
		<description>We will hasten the approval of drugs as more companies use newer technologies available to minmize cost and time to market.

J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will hasten the approval of drugs as more companies use newer technologies available to minmize cost and time to market.</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380672</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380672</guid>
		<description>Reviewer - no, I didn't know that.  Why do you think that may be?

J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviewer - no, I didn&#8217;t know that.  Why do you think that may be?</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An FDA Reviewer</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/life-after-andy-searching-for-fda-leadership-at-the-fda/#comment-380671</link>
		<dc:creator>An FDA Reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17339#comment-380671</guid>
		<description>The WSJ blog indicated Janet Woodcock the current CDER Director would really make Pharma happy.

A number of FDA reviewers I've know have said that they believe she deserves to be put in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ blog indicated Janet Woodcock the current CDER Director would really make Pharma happy.</p>
<p>A number of FDA reviewers I&#8217;ve know have said that they believe she deserves to be put in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.158 seconds -->

