<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merck&#8217;s Pasternak: We Had To Dispel The Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/mercks-pasternak-we-had-to-dispel-the-rumors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/mercks-pasternak-we-had-to-dispel-the-rumors/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PaulGGG</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/mercks-pasternak-we-had-to-dispel-the-rumors/#comment-380983</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulGGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17430#comment-380983</guid>
		<description>Good to hear they are staying in CV research, they have a great history in this area and it would be unfortunate to throw all out the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear they are staying in CV research, they have a great history in this area and it would be unfortunate to throw all out the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.146 seconds -->

