<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama, Pharma And Pricing Pressures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380566</guid>
		<description>Over the next four years, the pharmaceutical industry is going to find itself between Barack and a hard place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the next four years, the pharmaceutical industry is going to find itself between Barack and a hard place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380552</guid>
		<description>Atlex, you may be right-it all comes down to where this falls on the priority list and whether "tinkering" can be done rather than reform.

I would think at this point strenghtening the FDA and the health insurance coverage debate will take priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlex, you may be right-it all comes down to where this falls on the priority list and whether &#8220;tinkering&#8221; can be done rather than reform.</p>
<p>I would think at this point strenghtening the FDA and the health insurance coverage debate will take priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380549</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380549</guid>
		<description>Part D is a ripoff to the American taxpayer.  Let's hope it comes to Obama's attention and he does something about the pricing. I permanently gave up my AARP membership when they backed the full-price bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part D is a ripoff to the American taxpayer.  Let&#8217;s hope it comes to Obama&#8217;s attention and he does something about the pricing. I permanently gave up my AARP membership when they backed the full-price bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atlex</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380529</link>
		<dc:creator>atlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380529</guid>
		<description>Bob,

I disagree with Zhang regarding Part D.  There are a number of proposed measures that could be easily (relatively speaking) implemented without destroying the current structure of this popular program.  Waxman and Baucus have two very different approaches, both of which can be implemented without significant changes.  And, since Congress is going to have a great desire to eliminate the "overpayment" to MA plans, it would be easy to use that legislation to make changes to Part D.

Atlex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>I disagree with Zhang regarding Part D.  There are a number of proposed measures that could be easily (relatively speaking) implemented without destroying the current structure of this popular program.  Waxman and Baucus have two very different approaches, both of which can be implemented without significant changes.  And, since Congress is going to have a great desire to eliminate the &#8220;overpayment&#8221; to MA plans, it would be easy to use that legislation to make changes to Part D.</p>
<p>Atlex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380525</guid>
		<description>Agree with Zhang--doubtful that the Medicare Part D law would be reopened just to deal with the pricing issue.  If the benefit were to be reformed strucutally then the effort would be justified.

It would be much easier for CMS to write regs lowering reimbursment to PDPs and Medicare Advantage plans than it would be to reopen the entire law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Zhang&#8211;doubtful that the Medicare Part D law would be reopened just to deal with the pricing issue.  If the benefit were to be reformed strucutally then the effort would be justified.</p>
<p>It would be much easier for CMS to write regs lowering reimbursment to PDPs and Medicare Advantage plans than it would be to reopen the entire law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Sarasohn-Kahn</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Sarasohn-Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380507</guid>
		<description>Health care's microeconomy is part of the larger US health macroeconomy. If someone like Peter Orszag, from the current Congressional Budget Office, is brought into head up, say, CMS, then health policy will play an integral role in the nation's macro-economic planning. He's been talking a lot about cost-drivers in the health economy over the past 2 years, and is named as a possible Obama appointee for CMS director.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health care&#8217;s microeconomy is part of the larger US health macroeconomy. If someone like Peter Orszag, from the current Congressional Budget Office, is brought into head up, say, CMS, then health policy will play an integral role in the nation&#8217;s macro-economic planning. He&#8217;s been talking a lot about cost-drivers in the health economy over the past 2 years, and is named as a possible Obama appointee for CMS director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/president-obama-pharma-and-pricing-pressures/#comment-380502</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17301#comment-380502</guid>
		<description>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/pharma-still-betting-on-barack-obama/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/pharma-still-betting-on-barack-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/pharma-still-betting-on-barack-obama/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->

