<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worst Practice? Senate Probes NPR Host&#8217;s Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: truthman30</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-383527</link>
		<dc:creator>truthman30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-383527</guid>
		<description>Psychiatry is an Industry , it has nothing to do with healing those who suffer from depression or helping those with "mental illness" , it's all about drugs and money, the sooner people get their head round that FACT, the sooner we can get rid of it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychiatry is an Industry , it has nothing to do with healing those who suffer from depression or helping those with &#8220;mental illness&#8221; , it&#8217;s all about drugs and money, the sooner people get their head round that FACT, the sooner we can get rid of it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salmon</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382656</link>
		<dc:creator>Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382656</guid>
		<description>Louis,

While I respect people's opinions. I have to disagree with you and many others who do not believe in mental illness or in psychiatric drugs.

There is some truth there, take for example what I posted about about how drugs increase suicide and suicidality. This can only be if there is some sort of biological underpinning that the drugs are effecting. I have seen people who clearly responded to psychiatric drugs in a very good way. My problem is that when we know of problems or that other approaches might be better we hide the problems and simply push drugs that we know are ineffective or dangerous in certain situations or people just to make money.

I do not want to completely stop the use of psychiatric drugs or the practice of psychiatry. I want the truth to come out so we can do the best we can with what we do know and not be so money hungry that we destroy people and their families simply to make a buck. Even so people will still be hurt because we can't make a totally safe drug and we can't predict 100% who will be hurt and who will be helped. But we need to honestly address the problems and minimize the harm as best we can. Drug companies will never do this on their own and they have so completely take over all the checks and balances that I am personally very afraid. I do not know yet if we can trust the incoming administration and Congress to do anything. If not then I fear we are looking at death and maiming on a massive scale worldwide.

Salmon

Salmon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis,</p>
<p>While I respect people&#8217;s opinions. I have to disagree with you and many others who do not believe in mental illness or in psychiatric drugs.</p>
<p>There is some truth there, take for example what I posted about about how drugs increase suicide and suicidality. This can only be if there is some sort of biological underpinning that the drugs are effecting. I have seen people who clearly responded to psychiatric drugs in a very good way. My problem is that when we know of problems or that other approaches might be better we hide the problems and simply push drugs that we know are ineffective or dangerous in certain situations or people just to make money.</p>
<p>I do not want to completely stop the use of psychiatric drugs or the practice of psychiatry. I want the truth to come out so we can do the best we can with what we do know and not be so money hungry that we destroy people and their families simply to make a buck. Even so people will still be hurt because we can&#8217;t make a totally safe drug and we can&#8217;t predict 100% who will be hurt and who will be helped. But we need to honestly address the problems and minimize the harm as best we can. Drug companies will never do this on their own and they have so completely take over all the checks and balances that I am personally very afraid. I do not know yet if we can trust the incoming administration and Congress to do anything. If not then I fear we are looking at death and maiming on a massive scale worldwide.</p>
<p>Salmon</p>
<p>Salmon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis kayser</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382653</link>
		<dc:creator>louis kayser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382653</guid>
		<description>First of all i do not believe in this so called psychiatry or mental health, it is really just a bunch of unproven theories endorsed by our great society.There is a conflict of interest when a doctor gets any kind of favors from ank drug companies, but don't just stop there. We also have conflicts of interssts from the news media, which often are paid to advertise for big pharma.Consequenty we don't always get the bad side of the drug companies in the news.Many years ago medical and legal ineties were not allowed to advertise like they can now, somehow as a laymen i managed to survive it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all i do not believe in this so called psychiatry or mental health, it is really just a bunch of unproven theories endorsed by our great society.There is a conflict of interest when a doctor gets any kind of favors from ank drug companies, but don&#8217;t just stop there. We also have conflicts of interssts from the news media, which often are paid to advertise for big pharma.Consequenty we don&#8217;t always get the bad side of the drug companies in the news.Many years ago medical and legal ineties were not allowed to advertise like they can now, somehow as a laymen i managed to survive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salmon</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382644</link>
		<dc:creator>Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382644</guid>
		<description>Zorro,

O where o where do I begin with Lamictal. This drug will go down as a classic of how Pharma hides toxicities and markets things.

Notice in the labeling how they talk about suicidality being inherent in bipolar illness. Well what you really need to get is the data for a head to head comparison with placebo eith the same duration of exposure, and look at the time frames and when it occurs. None of this well we continued people on Lamictal for a year, i.e. those who didn't commit suicide in the first month when it occurs, and when we express the 10 cases on Lamictal per month we get a lower rate than the 1 case on placebo that also occurred during the first month. But we didn't continue anybody on placebo longer than 1 month in part because it would have screwed up our normalization.

In other words 10 suicides in 100 people on Lamictal during the first month, and only 1 suicide on placebo in 100 people during the first month. Now we continue Lamictal for a year with no more suicides but we don't continue placebo. So we get 10 suicides per 100 people years on Lamictal and 12 suicides per 100 people years on Placebo.

Now I don't know if this is what was done with Lamictal but I do know that this has been done with several other drugs for bipolar illness.

Salmon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zorro,</p>
<p>O where o where do I begin with Lamictal. This drug will go down as a classic of how Pharma hides toxicities and markets things.</p>
<p>Notice in the labeling how they talk about suicidality being inherent in bipolar illness. Well what you really need to get is the data for a head to head comparison with placebo eith the same duration of exposure, and look at the time frames and when it occurs. None of this well we continued people on Lamictal for a year, i.e. those who didn&#8217;t commit suicide in the first month when it occurs, and when we express the 10 cases on Lamictal per month we get a lower rate than the 1 case on placebo that also occurred during the first month. But we didn&#8217;t continue anybody on placebo longer than 1 month in part because it would have screwed up our normalization.</p>
<p>In other words 10 suicides in 100 people on Lamictal during the first month, and only 1 suicide on placebo in 100 people during the first month. Now we continue Lamictal for a year with no more suicides but we don&#8217;t continue placebo. So we get 10 suicides per 100 people years on Lamictal and 12 suicides per 100 people years on Placebo.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t know if this is what was done with Lamictal but I do know that this has been done with several other drugs for bipolar illness.</p>
<p>Salmon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382602</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382602</guid>
		<description>Thank Goddess for Grassley.  I hope Waxman will become as aggressive in tackling Big Pharma.  As for Van Hollen, what a crashing disappointment, which I will immediately share with Obama's website, change.gov.

And Salmon's remark about the extreme danger of Lamictal is spot on - came within a hair of losing my daughter to it from suicidality.  She was prescribed it for bipolar depression.  Another crock from Glaxo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Goddess for Grassley.  I hope Waxman will become as aggressive in tackling Big Pharma.  As for Van Hollen, what a crashing disappointment, which I will immediately share with Obama&#8217;s website, change.gov.</p>
<p>And Salmon&#8217;s remark about the extreme danger of Lamictal is spot on - came within a hair of losing my daughter to it from suicidality.  She was prescribed it for bipolar depression.  Another crock from Glaxo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike K.</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382601</guid>
		<description>This is big news.  Have you taken a look at the cast of characters involved with Best Practice?  This could be the biggest cache to date for Grassley:  http://www.best-practice.net/about/affiliates/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is big news.  Have you taken a look at the cast of characters involved with Best Practice?  This could be the biggest cache to date for Grassley:  <a href="http://www.best-practice.net/about/affiliates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.best-practice.net/about/affiliates/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Caped Crusader</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382590</link>
		<dc:creator>The Caped Crusader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382590</guid>
		<description>Simply put this is appalling.  A new avenue for their evil ways?  I suspect sadly it may be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply put this is appalling.  A new avenue for their evil ways?  I suspect sadly it may be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grassleyrocks</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382566</link>
		<dc:creator>grassleyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382566</guid>
		<description>"dissemination of new “off label” information"

They all come tumbling down.  Go Grassley Go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dissemination of new “off label” information&#8221;</p>
<p>They all come tumbling down.  Go Grassley Go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382541</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382541</guid>
		<description>Hello Hello,

Just to clarify, you wrote: "Even this article’s description of the web site as offering this service is inaccurate and misleading."

I wasn't the one chose to describe the site in this way. I was reporting Grassley's description - two different things.

Regards
ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Hello,</p>
<p>Just to clarify, you wrote: &#8220;Even this article’s description of the web site as offering this service is inaccurate and misleading.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t the one chose to describe the site in this way. I was reporting Grassley&#8217;s description - two different things.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/11/worst-practice-senate-probe-npr-hosts-firm/#comment-382539</link>
		<dc:creator>Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=17923#comment-382539</guid>
		<description>By the way a NAMI chapter which had links to Best Practices is in Maryland and congressional Representative Chris Van Hollen who represents many FDA employees was/is on the board. 

One of the things that Representative Van Hollen has repeatedly pointed to in his legislative career in the Maryland Senate is that he repeatedly pushed for the forced psychiatric medication of patients, which includes forcibly medicating children.

Representative Van Hollen is currently Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and serves on the Oversight and Government Reform committee which oversees FDA.

Prior to running for Congress Representative Van Hollen was in private practice in a lobbying firm that represented many pharmaceutical companies. If you look at the source of his money much of it also appears to be from his ex-associates, and he appears to be building a war chest to run for Senator Mikulski's seat when she retires and to replace her on the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way a NAMI chapter which had links to Best Practices is in Maryland and congressional Representative Chris Van Hollen who represents many FDA employees was/is on the board. </p>
<p>One of the things that Representative Van Hollen has repeatedly pointed to in his legislative career in the Maryland Senate is that he repeatedly pushed for the forced psychiatric medication of patients, which includes forcibly medicating children.</p>
<p>Representative Van Hollen is currently Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and serves on the Oversight and Government Reform committee which oversees FDA.</p>
<p>Prior to running for Congress Representative Van Hollen was in private practice in a lobbying firm that represented many pharmaceutical companies. If you look at the source of his money much of it also appears to be from his ex-associates, and he appears to be building a war chest to run for Senator Mikulski&#8217;s seat when she retires and to replace her on the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.173 seconds -->

