<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Diabetes Meds Must Have Heart Risk Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/new-diabetes-meds-must-have-heart-risk-info/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/new-diabetes-meds-must-have-heart-risk-info/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cheap diabetic testing supplies</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/new-diabetes-meds-must-have-heart-risk-info/#comment-403831</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap diabetic testing supplies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18721#comment-403831</guid>
		<description>These latest recommendations are unlikely to go down well with the pharmaceutical firms who are developing new treatments for diabetes as they would inevitably led to more studies and increased costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These latest recommendations are unlikely to go down well with the pharmaceutical firms who are developing new treatments for diabetes as they would inevitably led to more studies and increased costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salmon</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/new-diabetes-meds-must-have-heart-risk-info/#comment-385447</link>
		<dc:creator>Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18721#comment-385447</guid>
		<description>Ed,

Your article states per the FDA that

"Patients with diabetes have a 2 to 4 times greater risk of heart disease, and none of the currently approved antidiabetic therapies has been convincingly proven to reduce that risk, the FDA says in its statement."

Except that the FDA says that Avandia increases the risk of cardiovascular toxicity 3 fold when added to insulin. The complete statement can be found on page 286 of the medical review approving the supplemental indication of Avandia in addition to insulin which is a publicly available document available on the Drugs@FDA.gov website.

Salmon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Your article states per the FDA that</p>
<p>&#8220;Patients with diabetes have a 2 to 4 times greater risk of heart disease, and none of the currently approved antidiabetic therapies has been convincingly proven to reduce that risk, the FDA says in its statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except that the FDA says that Avandia increases the risk of cardiovascular toxicity 3 fold when added to insulin. The complete statement can be found on page 286 of the medical review approving the supplemental indication of Avandia in addition to insulin which is a publicly available document available on the <a href="mailto:Drugs@FDA.gov">Drugs@FDA.gov</a> website.</p>
<p>Salmon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.149 seconds -->

