<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pharmalot&#8230; Pharmalittle&#8230; Good Morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/pharmalot-pharmalittle-good-morning-127/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/pharmalot-pharmalittle-good-morning-127/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/pharmalot-pharmalittle-good-morning-127/#comment-384890</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18587#comment-384890</guid>
		<description>Nathan - 
The announcement of increasing R &#38; D expenditures made by BayerAG covers more than just their pharmaceuticals. The article also suggests increased R &#38; D expenditures in the areas of MaterialScience and CropScience.

For example: "Between 2008 and 2012, Bayer CropScience intends to invest a total of EUR 3.4 billion in research and development." 

At the same time, Bayer also states they are looking for additional tax breaks and increased patent protections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan -<br />
The announcement of increasing R &amp; D expenditures made by BayerAG covers more than just their pharmaceuticals. The article also suggests increased R &amp; D expenditures in the areas of MaterialScience and CropScience.</p>
<p>For example: &#8220;Between 2008 and 2012, Bayer CropScience intends to invest a total of EUR 3.4 billion in research and development.&#8221; </p>
<p>At the same time, Bayer also states they are looking for additional tax breaks and increased patent protections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/pharmalot-pharmalittle-good-morning-127/#comment-384708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18587#comment-384708</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan,

Yes, this is the same company. Here is the staetement Bayer issued on Friday...

http://www.bayer.com/en/News-Detail.aspx?id=11455

As to your question, which is a good one, I can only say 'what a difference two years can make.' However, the Bayer statement is short on specifics, unfortunately, so I don't have a good answer. I've not seen a report from the press conference in Germany that offered further details either, although I will check.

Regards
ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan,</p>
<p>Yes, this is the same company. Here is the staetement Bayer issued on Friday&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bayer.com/en/News-Detail.aspx?id=11455" rel="nofollow">http://www.bayer.com/en/News-Detail.aspx?id=11455</a></p>
<p>As to your question, which is a good one, I can only say &#8216;what a difference two years can make.&#8217; However, the Bayer statement is short on specifics, unfortunately, so I don&#8217;t have a good answer. I&#8217;ve not seen a report from the press conference in Germany that offered further details either, although I will check.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/pharmalot-pharmalittle-good-morning-127/#comment-384701</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18587#comment-384701</guid>
		<description>Isn't it a little odd for Bayer to be announcing an increase in R&#38;D spending less than a year after it closed two sites of R&#38;D operations in the US?  (link below)

http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/11/09/afx3160321.html

(although I'm a bit confused about whether Bayer AG is the same as the Bayer in the pharmatimes article linked by Ed)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it a little odd for Bayer to be announcing an increase in R&amp;D spending less than a year after it closed two sites of R&amp;D operations in the US?  (link below)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/11/09/afx3160321.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/11/09/afx3160321.html</a></p>
<p>(although I&#8217;m a bit confused about whether Bayer AG is the same as the Bayer in the pharmatimes article linked by Ed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.148 seconds -->

