<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK&#8217;s NICE To Lift Ban On Kidney Cancer Meds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/uks-nice-to-lift-ban-on-kidney-cancer-meds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/uks-nice-to-lift-ban-on-kidney-cancer-meds/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: harry harrinordiquy</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/12/uks-nice-to-lift-ban-on-kidney-cancer-meds/#comment-383686</link>
		<dc:creator>harry harrinordiquy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=18091#comment-383686</guid>
		<description>I wonder which companies fund the Kidney Cancer patient group. I would question the 'brilliance' of all four products in that setting.

Neither Avastin or Sutent have demonstrated increased overall survival in this indication and the best either Nexavar or Torisel can do is extend survival by four months compared with placebo. 

Should payers pay through the nose for drugs that only prove efficacy against a surrograte endpoint? If they should, they certainly won't for much longer.

And four months extra versus placebo is hardly revolutionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder which companies fund the Kidney Cancer patient group. I would question the &#8216;brilliance&#8217; of all four products in that setting.</p>
<p>Neither Avastin or Sutent have demonstrated increased overall survival in this indication and the best either Nexavar or Torisel can do is extend survival by four months compared with placebo. </p>
<p>Should payers pay through the nose for drugs that only prove efficacy against a surrograte endpoint? If they should, they certainly won&#8217;t for much longer.</p>
<p>And four months extra versus placebo is hardly revolutionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.156 seconds -->

