Amgen Sued By 15 States Over Aranesp Kickbacks

2 Comments

doctorsandmoney12The lawsuit charges Amgen - along with a specialty group purchasing organization known as International Nephrology Network and the ASD Healthcare wholesaler - with offering kickbacks to medical providers to increase sales of its Aranesp anemia drug, Aranesp. The multi-state suit, by the way, joins a whistleblower lawsuit filed in 2006 by Amgen sales reps.

The companies encouraged health care providers to bill third-party payers such as Medicaid for free Aranesp in hopes of taking business away from Johnson & Johnson’s Procrit. Amgen also conspired with INN and ASD Healthcare to provide sham consultant agreements, weekend retreats and other services to get them to purchase and prescribe Aranesp (here is the lawsuit).

“Drugs should be prescribed to patients on the basis of need, effectiveness, and safety, not on a corporate giant’s promise of an all-expense paid vacation. In an egregious violation of the law, Amgen allegedly bribed medical providers and left taxpayers footing the bill for free drug samples,” Cuomo says in a statement.

“We believe that the allegations are without merit, and we look forward to the opportunity to examine these matters with the states before the Court,” Amgen spokesman David Polk wrote Bloomberg News. He added that Amgen’s Code of Conduct is called “Do the Right Thing,” and employees are expected to follow it, but declined further comment.

Aranesp has lost sales since 2006, Bloomberg notes, when high doses of the drug were linked to higher rates of heart attack and death in kidney patients. Aranesp sales fell 25 percent in 2008 to $3.1 billion from $4.1 billion in 2006. Aranesp was approved by the FDA in 2001 to treat anemia associated with renal failure and in 2002 to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. If a HC reform or other bill passes that includes patent exclusivity expiration for biotech tech drugs, I worry that that a shorter profit period will only serve to further incentivize these types of potentially dangerous strategies.

    Also, from the looks of things, there does not appear to be a production deficit or output capacity issues for the ESA medicines. If this case is any indication, the opposite- overcapacity- may be the problem that is helping to precipitate kickback and rebates schemes. I worry that biosimilar versions of ESA drugs will only further increase overcapacity and serve to further incentivize kickback and rebate issues that these companies are accused of engaging in and create additional potential for drug diversion.

    ESAs are good drugs, but too much and/or dosing for too long may unnecessarily increase risk.

  2. I am not surprised to see this come out. For years I have wondered how certain drugs were able to be passed considering the risks to health and safety.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Clear

Clear

All rights reserved, Nojasa LLC. Copyright, Nojasa LLC.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/