<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDA Fails To Follow-Up On Questionable Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JaT</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/#comment-442236</link>
		<dc:creator>JaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19291#comment-442236</guid>
		<description>Maybe ANDAs will be considered too at some point. 
Particularly ANDAs or sANDAs (supplemental Abbreviated New Drug Applications- which exist but don't exist?) submitted by the current holder of an innovator product, after they change the recipe.

Some of those evidently aren't reviewed at all before approval.
 
Nothing quite like taking your usual medication only to find yourself in the ER and in serious trouble because it is no longer effective for you.
_________
What is more dangerous...

Finding that a new drug is hazardous to your health?

Or trusting a product you have safely been on for over a decade- only to find that NOW it is hazardous to your health- and knowing that by some stretch- the warning label still applies.
__________
After the second scenario can you ever trust pharmaceuticals again?

Anyway- Go Grassley!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe ANDAs will be considered too at some point.<br />
Particularly ANDAs or sANDAs (supplemental Abbreviated New Drug Applications- which exist but don&#8217;t exist?) submitted by the current holder of an innovator product, after they change the recipe.</p>
<p>Some of those evidently aren&#8217;t reviewed at all before approval.</p>
<p>Nothing quite like taking your usual medication only to find yourself in the ER and in serious trouble because it is no longer effective for you.<br />
_________<br />
What is more dangerous&#8230;</p>
<p>Finding that a new drug is hazardous to your health?</p>
<p>Or trusting a product you have safely been on for over a decade- only to find that NOW it is hazardous to your health- and knowing that by some stretch- the warning label still applies.<br />
__________<br />
After the second scenario can you ever trust pharmaceuticals again?</p>
<p>Anyway- Go Grassley!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/#comment-442020</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19291#comment-442020</guid>
		<description>Ed

You mean the Government Accountability Office.

Marilyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed</p>
<p>You mean the Government Accountability Office.</p>
<p>Marilyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaynesday</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/#comment-441974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaynesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19291#comment-441974</guid>
		<description>Fast tracking products without care for the viability of the product or the satisfaction of the consumer.
Commonly known as puppy mills or as we know them now The FDA Drug Mill.

Sorry, I know, way to smarmy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast tracking products without care for the viability of the product or the satisfaction of the consumer.<br />
Commonly known as puppy mills or as we know them now The FDA Drug Mill.</p>
<p>Sorry, I know, way to smarmy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Holford</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/#comment-441941</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Holford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19291#comment-441941</guid>
		<description>Jeez, Grassley must be reeeaaaally pissed, by now.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, Grassley must be reeeaaaally pissed, by now.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sasich</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/10/fda-fails-to-follow-up-on-questionable-drugs-gao/#comment-441927</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sasich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19291#comment-441927</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

Would you like a copy of the Markey Report on this topic?

Best,

Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>Would you like a copy of the Markey Report on this topic?</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.151 seconds -->

