Canada Reviews Pfizer Exec Named To Health Board
2 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // November 19th, 2009 // 11:55 am
Canada’s Health Committee plans to review the controversial appointment of a Pfizer exec to the board of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the government agency that oversees health research in Canada, The Tyee reports.
Bernard Prigent, Pfizer Canada’s medical director, was appointed last month to the CIHR’s governing council (see here). Last month, CIHR president Alain Beaudet said that he hopes to create closer ties with industry to ensure involvemetn and investment, but the move has stirred concerns since the organization is responsible for allocating research funding across the country, the paper writes.
“There’s no place in our scientific organizations like CIHR for a drug company official,” NDP MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis, tells The Tyee. “It’s shocking that this government appointed the vice president of the biggest brand name drug company in the world, to the board of the CIHR which is supposed to be a body of independents and scientific endeavors free from any ties to industry at all.”
This is actually the second flap this week in Canada involving Pfizer in some way. The same person who led a controversial review that provided controversial advice on British Columbia’s pharmaceutical policies has a new position advising the drugmaker, The Tyee notes.
Don Avison was recently appointed as the Canadian representative on Pfizer Global’s International Advisory Board, according to The Tyee. Two years ago, the BC government appointed Avison as the chair of a pharmaceutical task force that advised the health ministry (back story).
The panel’s report, released last year, suggested cutting the amount paid for generics and getting rid of the University of British Columbia’s Therapeutics Initiative, a group of researchers who provide independent evidence-based advice about prescription drugs.
“Is this international advisory position payback for what he delivered in the task force report? Because that’s what it looks like,” health policy researcher Alan Cassels tells The Tyee. Avison didn’t respond to the paper’s request for comment.
But British Columbia Health Minister Kevin Falcon isn’t perturbed. “If someone’s speculating that as a result of the task force he’s now taken a position that he’s going to receive a personal benefit out of as a result of work he did, I don’t think that would be fair based on my assessment of Don and his many years of public service,” he tells The Tyee. “He did a good job, very good job in fact, as chair of the pharmaceutical task force. The fact he’s now been asked to sit on an international advisory board, I don’t have any discomfort with that.”
abby lippman
Thanks for posting this news. The next chapter has already been written: it was announced earlier this week that the CIHR is giving a 2009 Galien prize for “excellence” to — you guessed it: Pfizer.
Please continue to include Canadian content; there’s much going on that needs airing.
Vance Berger
Truly wonderful example of symbiosis; both sides benefit. Industry and government. Of course, a broader perspective reveals that ostensible symbiosis is often embedded in a larger, hidden, zero-sum game. That is, the gain to the two highlighted parties is offset by a commensurate loss to a third party.
Clearly, this is the case here, as the public will get screwed even more than it already is. We already have experiments conducted by those with the greatest vested interest in the outcomes, and using discretion every way imaginable to ensure that whatever is studied will appear to be safe and effective for whatever disease was concocted (oh, look, I have a hang nail — is there a drug for this?).
To whom do we appeal? Where is the higher court? You politely ask a thief to stop robbing you and you won’t get very far. You need to create a disincentive. How do we, the public, do that? We need to educate ourselves to what is really happening, and stop trusting doctors on the take to tell us what is best for us. They may or may not know, but either way, they certainly don’t care. If we all knew this, and acted accordingly, then things would have to change. Until then, buckle up for the ride, because we are damned sure going to see some serious turbulence. I hope they have a pill for that, too.